1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesya [120]
3 years ago
6

The poems "I Hear America Singing" and "I, Too" speak of the American identity, but they differ in many ways. Which analysis cor

rectly presents the contrast between the two poems? 1.) In Whitman's poem, the poet sings to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, the speaker's voice is stifled when he is sent to the kitchen, demonstrating that everyone has an equal opportunity to be part of the American identity.
2.) In Whitman's poem, the workers use their voices to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, the speaker's voice is stifled when he is sent to the kitchen, demonstrating that not everyone has an equal opportunity to be part of the American identity.
3.) In Whitman's poem, the workers use their voices to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, the speaker rejects sharing a meal with others at the table, demonstrating that everyone has an equal opportunity to be part of the American identity if they so choose.
4.) In Whitman's poem, the poet sings to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, only the people in the kitchen play an important role.
English
2 answers:
alexandr402 [8]3 years ago
6 0
The question ask to choose among the following choices that states the correct analysis that represent the contrast of the both poems and the best answer would be # 3. <span>In Whitman's poem, the workers use their voices to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, the speaker rejects sharing a meal with others at the table, demonstrating that everyone has an equal opportunity to be part of the American identity if they so choose.</span>
Burka [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

the answer is #2 : "In Whitman's poem, the workers use their voices to proclaim an American identity in which each person plays an equal part. In contrast, in Hughes's poem, the speaker's voice is stifled when he is sent to the kitchen, demonstrating that not everyone has an equal opportunity to be part of the American identity."

Explanation:

i took this on plato and got it right

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from "Bluesman on the Move
V125BC [204]
Loneliness. ^-^ It is lonliness because he is all alone and he means ghosts meaning no one else is there.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What clues does this nonfiction text give about the
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

O.  direct statements and portrayal of characters

Explanation:

The above is the clue to the author's perspective on nature as given in the non fiction write-up.

6 0
3 years ago
What kind of sentence structure is this: Everyone in Whoville, now Originalville, is their own individual, and they wouldn’t hav
Keith_Richards [23]
That is a compound complex sentence. :)
3 0
3 years ago
What is a characteristic of Grendel that is mentional in the story?​
Reika [66]

Answer: In Grendel, however, he is an intelligent and temperamental monster, capable of rational thought as well as irrational outbursts of emotion. Throughout the novel, the monster Grendel often seems as human as the people he observes.

Explanation: IN the original Beowulf epic, Grendel displays nothing but the most primitive human qualities. In Grendel, however, he is an intelligent and temperamental monster, capable of rational thought as well as irrational outbursts of emotion. Throughout the novel, the monster Grendel often seems as human as the people he observes. Grendel’s history supports this ambiguous characterization. As a descendant of the biblical Cain, he shares a basic lineage with human beings. However, rather than draw Grendel and humankind closer together, this shared history sets them in perpetual enmity. In this regard, Grendel recalls the nineteenth-century literary convention—used in novels such as Victor Hugo’s The Hunchback of Notre-Dame and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein—of using monsters to help us examine what it means, by contrast, to be human. Indeed, aside from Grendel’s horrible appearance and nasty eating habits, very little actually separates him from humans. Even his extreme brutality is not unique—time and again, Gardner stresses man’s inherent violence. Moreover, Grendel’s philosophical quest is a very human one, its urgency heightened by his status as an outsider.

The novel follows Grendel through three stages of his life. The first stage is his childhood, which he spends innocently exploring his confined world, untroubled by the outside universe or philosophical questions. Grendel’s discovery of the lake of firesnakes and the realm beyond it is his first introduction to the larger world, one full of danger and possibility. As such, crossing the lake is a crucial step for Grendel in his move toward adulthood. The second step—which decisively makes Grendel an adult—occurs when the bull attacks him, prompting him to realize that the world is essentially chaotic, following no pattern and governed by no discernible reason. This realization, in turn, prompts the question that shapes Grendel’s adult quest, perhaps the greatest philosophical question of the twentieth century: given a world with no inherent meaning, how should one live his or her life? In the second, adult stage of his life, Grendel tries to answer this question by observing the human community, which fascinates him because of its ability to make patterns and then impose those patterns on the world, creating a sense that the world follows a coherent, ordered system. The third and final stage of Grendel’s life encompasses his fatal battle with Beowulf and the weeks leading up to that battle. The encounter provides, ultimately, a violent resolution to Grendel’s quest.

7 0
3 years ago
How is alteration of the past a justified practice in oceania in 1984?​
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

aen fo

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one way in which traditional storytelling is different from modernist stories?
    15·2 answers
  • What advice did dr.flint assume jacobs would try to do?
    13·1 answer
  • What literary device does the author use to describe johnny's mugging in the outsiders?
    12·2 answers
  • Order the process for writing the critical book review.
    5·2 answers
  • What is a preposition
    5·2 answers
  • 9. For what/whom is the scarlet ibis a symbol? Give 3 details that<br> lead you to this conclusion.
    6·1 answer
  • What statements about American society do you think Irving is making in "The Devil and Tom Walker" how do you think these statem
    15·1 answer
  • "Cars are noisy. dirty, smelly and downright dangerous. They should be banned
    15·1 answer
  • What is the central idea of "Infinite Flow”?
    7·2 answers
  • Is it nesscessary for some people to suffer for others to be happy
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!