Answer:
the pame
Explanation: becus it is the manie part
Answer:
Has just begun to develop survival skills
Explanation:
An excerpt from the story supports that: "As he went along he smelled things, as well, his distended, quivering nostrils carrying to his brain an endless series of messages from the outside world. Also, his hearing was acute, and had been so trained that it operated automatically. Without conscious effort, he heard all the slight sounds in the apparent quiet—heard, and differentiated, and classified these sounds—whether they were of the wind rustling the leaves, of the humming of bees and gnats, of the distant rumble of the sea that drifted to him only in lulls, or of the gopher, just under his foot, shoving a pouchful of earth into the entrance of his hole."
From the above excerpt, we can deduce that Edwin was actually developing his survival skills. In developing his survival skills, his smelling, feeling and hearing organs were alert and firm. When the bear came, Edwin stood firm without running away. He was able to make the bear to leave them. Edwin was building experience and skills which might be relevant.
Answer:
- "[Harun al-Rashid] held power for more than two decades, from 786 to 809 CE."
- "…his empire extended from modern Morocco to India."
Explanation:
A strong ruler manages to remain in power for many years. According to the article, we can confirm that Harun al-Rashid was that type of ruler because we learned that he remained in power for more than 20 years, through the lines "[Harun al-Rashid] held power for more than two decades , from 786 to 809 CE. "
We also learned that he was a great conqueror of nations, managing to expand his territory in an efficient and impressive way. This information is shown to us through the lines "... his empire extended from modern Morocco to India."
I remember one time I wanted cookies ,but I didnt ask. I wanted to do the right thing & ask but I don't know what I was thinking I was younger so, I didn't ask. As soon as I grabbed the cookie I got caught. Boom, do the right thing.
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
