<span>A number of reforms were passed after the Sharpstown scandal in 1971-72 that led to much tighter controls on lobbying by officials. Officials must disclose their income sources, citizens have the ability to see more governmental records, and disclosure records of lobbyists who are paid were put into effect.</span>
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
The adopted it because they feared that if they were to intervene it would escalate. Also because the non intervention would prevent a war from happening in the European side of the world.
(let me know if you need a more detailed explanation)
Explanation:
g6gg6v5f5f5f5f5fff6ff6yfsygguwxugzwuhzwubwxuhxeh8ef8h3f8hf4ubd4ubeduh3dbuf4ih4fih4fuheduhbucehucrhurvburcubrv
