1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
3 years ago
7

What can be inferred from these lines describing the pardoner in Chaucer's prologue to The Canterbury Tales? He had a fine veron

ica sewed to cap. His wallet lay before him in his lap, Stuffed full of pardons brought from Rome all hot. A. He had a scholarly look. B. He was an unethical man. C. He was an honest person. D. He pretended not to care for riches. E. He cared about people's well-being.
English
1 answer:
Verdich [7]3 years ago
6 0

B. He was an unethical man.


The lines from The Canterbury Tales about the pardoner describes how he seems to have lots of money, enough to buy a hat with nice material with a nice fat wallet of pardons. This suggests that the pardoner is corrupt because in the time period Chaucer is writing, one could sell "pardons." You can conclude that the pardoner makes his money from selling holy forgiveness in the form of "pardons."

You might be interested in
Pros and cons of remaining anonymous while voicing dissent​
Sindrei [870]

Answer:

vvv

Explanation:

Pros

-------

-If people disagree with your opinion, you won't get any backlash from it as they won't know who you are.

-you can say your opinion without feeling ashamed of it, or feeling like other people are judging <em>you</em>, as they can't as they don't know who you are.

Cons

------

- People are likely to use your anonymity to undermine your opinion.

Sorry, cant think of any more, hope this helps

:)

7 0
2 years ago
Which statement describes an advantage of nonrenewable resources?
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

D they are currently found in abundance.

Explanation:

The statement that describes the advantage of a non-renewable energy source is that they are currently found in abundance.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a word has more than one definition, a reader can figure it out by using context clues. Context clues are
Phantasy [73]

Answer:A is the correct answer

Explanation:The reason for that is because if you ever don't understand a word you see the surrounding words or phrases.For example,the sentence "The little girl coward in fear when she saw the spider" Lets say you didn't know what coward meant but w do know that the sentence states that she feared the spider so coward might mean to be afraid or unable to do something.

6 0
3 years ago
Franklin Roosevelt's "State of the Union Address, 1941," excerpt (...) For there is nothing mysterious about the foundations of
Mila [183]

Answer:

I am assured of the willingness of almost all Americans to respond to that call is the correct answer.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“In separate columns on a sheet of paper write a complete subject and the completepredicate of these words”
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

In the first sentence the subject is "urban sprawl" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate. In the second sentence, the subject is "Growing families" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate.

The subject of a sentence is the term that suffers or provokes the action of the verb of the sentence, while the predicate is all the terms that deny or affirm something about the subject.

In this case, it is important that you know which term is the verb of each sentence, as this term is essential for the subject to be found.

The verb is the term that indicates an action, or a state of the individual. In the two sentences presented above, the verbs are "to harm" and "to want."

Knowing which term is the verb of the sentence, you can find the subject and predicate as follows:

  • To find the subject, ask who is causing or suffering the action of seeing.
  1. In the first sentence: Who is harming the habitat? Who is harming the habitat is urban expansion. In this case, urban expansion is the subject of the sentence.
  2. In the second sentence: Who wants bigger houses and yards? Growing families. Hence, growing families are the subject of the sentence.
  • To find the predicate, identify what is being said about the subject of each sentence.
  1. In the first sentence: What is urban expansion doing? It's harming the habitat.
  2. In the second sentence: what do growing families want? They want bigger houses and yards.

You can find more information at the link below:

brainly.com/question/3733575?referrer=searchResults

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP 15 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!Jimmy's return to his room above Mike's café is an important plot point in the story. One of the thing
    15·2 answers
  • in the story "Monkeys Paw", do our choices have an impact on the course of our lives, or are our lives predetermined no matter w
    9·1 answer
  • Which word has a meaning that is similar to the word flaunt?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains what causes Snowball
    12·2 answers
  • PLS HELP I NEED THIS DONE
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the best claim for an argumentative essay that supports the sale of unlabeled genetically modified food? Food companies
    13·1 answer
  • What is Imagery?(don't copy and pasted from the internet)
    15·2 answers
  • What is the name of school where bir bahadur works?​
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone help, please?<br> What is the summary for act 1 in Julius Ceasar?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain how the economy in 2009 affected the size of chip bags. How did the cost of ingredients affect the bag size? How might t
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!