<span>His impact on the Industrial Revolution in America was the biggest of any single U.S. citizen. His trust of oil, and control of the railroads, and oil tank cars on the railroad allowed him immense power since the federal government instituted no regulation of business to allow competition to develop in the various industries totally or in-part controlled by Rockefeller. This ended of course when Theodore Roosevelt broke the industrial trusts early in the 20th century. Rockefeller did go on to institute many worthwhile charities and foundations that have and continue to benefit people around the world. Rockefeller had no peer when it came to making business decisions that only he would make with regular success that eventually made him the wealthiest person in United States history. Using today's wealth standards his personal fortune was well over 1/4 of a trillion (that's with a T) dollars.</span>
The answer is true. Have a great day!
AnsweAgriculture allowed farmers to use genetics to select the best crops for their areas. Agriculture also enabled the population of Pre-Columbian America to increase. People could now live in permanent villages. In time, these villages created their own systems of governance.Explanation:
Answer:
Governments use normative economics, and businesses use positive economics.
Explanation:
Normative economics concentrates on the importance of economic equity, or what the marketplace 'should be' or 'ought to be' whether positive economics is based on experience and cannot be confirmed or disallowed, normative economics is established on worth judgments. An example of positive economics is, an increment in tax rates eventually results in a reduction in total tax wealth. On the other hand, normative economics is, unemployment hurts an economy more than inflation.
Answer:
During Sherman's March to the Sea, the Necktie became a symbol of the intentional destruction by the United States Army. With the railroads all torn up, there was no way for supplies to enter into cities like Savannah, which meant that its people had little to eat with little hope of getting more.
