1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
beks73 [17]
3 years ago
7

Which rational number equals 0 point 4 with bar over 4? 2 over 10 2 over 9 4 over 10 4 over 9

Mathematics
1 answer:
lord [1]3 years ago
6 0
0.4444.... =\frac{4}{10-1} = \frac{4}{9}
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Working 6 days, a worker earned<br> 150000 LL<br> a) How much will he earn by working 21<br> days?
Mila [183]

Answer:

525,000 LL

Step-by-step explanation:

6 x 3 = 18 (days)

150,000 x 3 = 450,000

21 - 18 = 3 so 6 * 2 = 3 ( 150,000 *(divide)  2 = 75,000)

so 450,000 + 75,000 = 525,000

7 0
3 years ago
(x,5), (-3,6); slope = -1
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

what exactly is the question to the problem ? it looks like it's already solved ? are you suppose to find something or ?

5 0
3 years ago
5(2 + 9) + 62 help meeee plss
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer:

117

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5.65 times 3.4 estimate
lidiya [134]
We can round 5.65 up to 6 and 3.4 down to 3.
3 * 6 = 18
now let's see how close our estimate is to the real answer
5.65 * 3.4 = 19.21
Our answer was pretty close to the real answer!

Hope I helped!
~ Zoe
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Order these numbers from least to greatest.<br> 2.103, 2.1, 2.13, 2.1312
    13·1 answer
  • 13/20 reduce to lowest fraction
    8·2 answers
  • Pedro gets 8 hours of sleep each night how many hours does Pedro sleep in a year with 365 days?
    8·2 answers
  • How to do exponential functions
    7·1 answer
  • It takes Walter n minutes to get to his friend's house. If he travels to his friend's house 8 days in a row, taking a total of 1
    6·1 answer
  • First-order linear differential equations
    9·1 answer
  • Plz help will mark brainliest if correct answer ​
    10·1 answer
  • _________________ please help!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Can you explain how you got your answer?
    14·1 answer
  • The sum of the digits of a three digit number is 19. The second digit is one more than the first digit. The third
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!