As this shows, once a self-contradiction is shown, the convention for writing an Indirect Proof is to then quit the indented sequence and write just the conclusion, followed by the justification “IP.” This means that the Indirect Proof has been accomplished: by showing that the assumption led to a self-contradiction
The correct answer is D. decreases . . . improves. McGeoch & McDonald (1931) tested their hypothesis that words with the same meaning would be more prone to interference than the unrelated information. In the experiment participants were given a list of words that they practised until they fully memorized it. They were then given another list to remember. The second lists varied, so the second list was totally unrelated. Others were given a second list that contained synonyms of the first. When asked to recall the first list, those who had learned synonyms in the second list had a weaker result and learning unrelated information in the second list produced less impairment. The conclusion was that the interference was most likely to occur with the similar material.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Profiling involves gathering information about an individual based on psychological and behavioural features in order to have a check or predict what the person could likely do or become under certain conditions atmosphere or company. It is used to check the criminal record of an individual or the likelihood of exhibiting certain criminal behaviour.
Profiling is legal and can be carried out by law enforcement officers, such checks includes identity checks, stop and search, border control, etc. It becomes illegal if it is done to discriminate against race, religion, sex, national origin and ethnic group. On such grounds it becomes illegal in the US, Europe and even under the international law.
