Answer:
Case background
1. Identify the plaintiff and defendant in the case.
2. Explain why the case was brought to the Supreme Court.
3. Describe the goal of each side in the case. What type of decision was desired?
Constitutional connections
4. Explain the key rights or amendments involved in the case.
5. Did the case primarily center on an issue of civil rights or civil liberties? Explain.
Case outcomes
6. Describe the majority decision of the court and several arguments as to why the justices ruled the way they did.
7. If there was one dissenting decision of the court, explain it in detail. Why did some justices disagree with the majority?
8. What precedent was set by the court’s decision? What impact did it have on American society?
Explanation:
The correct answer is Caucus. Political party caucuses was the dominant system for choosing candidates in the presidential nominating process. They are open to any registered voter in a party, although experts say the process is dominated by party activists. Caucuses are party meetings by district, or county, where party members gather to discuss the candidates and to select delegates to the next round of party conventions. Delegates selected at a caucus might go on to a county or state convention before attending the national convention in the summer. This process of gathering and talking distinguishes caucuses from primaries.
<span>"according to some research, the degree" of implicit prejudice has declined, but the degree of explicit </span><span>prejudice keeps it alive under the surface.
</span>
Implicit and explicit are two opposite words, the meaning of implicit is, "inferred or saw however not doubtlessly or straightforwardly communicated." whereas explicit means "to completely and unmistakably express something, leaving nothing suggested."
