The Chaldean Empire began on 605 B.C. and they claimed many lands that once belonged to the Assyrians, but Egypt was not one of them.
By the time that the Chaldean Empire started, it also started an alliance between the Assyrians and Egyptians to fight the Babylonians.
They both had their armies destroyed. Assyria was never to be recognized again as an independent power and Egypt retreated, becoming insignificant for a while.
Egypt used Greek mercenaries to get rid of the domain that the Assyrians had over them and they did go through a prosper time, but it for the Persians to show up and dominate them in the 500s B.C.
Explanation:
The strategy of "containment" is best known as a Cold War foreign policy of the United States and its allies to prevent the spread of communism after the end of World War II.
Answer:
Critical thinking is the process of reasoning, analyzing, and making important decisions. It's an important skill in making career
decisions.
Explanation:
Critical thinking involves an intentional judgment to reflect on what to believe or how to respond to close examination, experience, oral or textual manifestation, and even extraneous propositions. It is also linked to the definition of the content and value of the observation object.
Critical thinking involves an intentional judgment to reflect on what to believe or how to respond to close examination, experience, oral or textual manifestation, and even extraneous propositions. It is also linked to the definition of the content and value of the observation object.
Based on this reasoning, we can conclude that critical thinking is the process of reasoning, analyzing, and making important decisions. It is an important skill in career decision making.
India got freedom on August 14th, 1947
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
However, doing some research we can say that the proper question for this statement is the following: <em>"Is Mark's service in a jury a responsibility or an obligation?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "an obligation."
According to the laws of the state, an individual who is summoned by the state to be part of a jury has the obligation to attend. If he or she does not attend, he should be fined according to the law. If the individual cannot attend, it has to be for a very important situation that has to be explained. Otherwise, the state will consider his +/her negativity to attend as a contempt of court.
