Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
So if we discussed the earth in the trees in the oxygen then it will be not many deaths love so then we’re gonna have to breathe
Answer:
A: It is what our government is based upon.
Explanation:
Basically, we can eliminate B since the Constitution is just within the US. C doesn't make sense becuase the Constitution has been amended multiple times, and D does not work becuase the Constitution does not mention political parties.
The answer is A becuase the Constitution outlines the foundation and basis of America including core values & base-level ideologies/laws.
The action that is most closely associated with totalitarian governments is (3) engaging in censorship and propaganda campaigns. A totalitarian government controls all aspect of public and private life in the country over which they rule. Examples of governments like this were the Nazi Regime, Italian Fascism and Soviet Communist Rule.
