<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
As the utility function is concave in shape, so person is risk averse. Thus, he will not accept the gamvle.
The difference between utility at point A&C = 70 minus 65 = $5, is less than a the difference between A&B = 65 minus 55 = $10
<u>MCQ:
</u>
Answer is option a&d - risk averse people fear a lot for losing money, thus they overestimate the probability of loss
Since, shape of utility function is concave, hence the double derivative of utility with respect to wealth is negative, so utility falls at an decreasing rate , as wealth increases
Depends on the banks policy. My bank is pretty good, and with my opt in overdraft protection, there are no incurred fees.
Answer:
c. Sales budget, budgeted income statement, budgeted balance sheet
Explanation:
First, we calculate the sales for the period. It would also calculatethe cash proceeds from sales, which will be useful for the balance sheet.
With that, we can plug sales revenue into the income statement and calcualte the net income.
And with the income statement, we can solve for retained earnings and build up the balance sheet. Among other data
Doing it in any other order, we are going to leave blanks and need to do the next one to fill them. In the proposed orde,r we do not need information from the subsequent budget to complete the previous one, which is good.
Answer:
given statement is true
Explanation:
solution
the given statement is true because
by encouraging, people of the lower income is contributing to their retirement savings account.
and IRS offers a tax credit for contributions to them for claim the retirement savings credit
so Jennifer must use IRS form 8880
and credit percentage decreases as the as AGI increases
so we can say given statement is true
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.