The correct answer is B. The potential for the results to improve the world is not evident.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical perspective ad theory that focuses on increasing the well-being and happiness of individuals while decreasing suffering or pain. Also, for utilitarians, the practical uses and results prevail over other factors. Due to this, utilitarians might argue science is not valuable because a big part of it is understanding how natural phenomenons work, and this might be considered to lack practical uses or to help the world improve. Thus, the reason for a utilitarian to argue against the value of science is that "the potential for the results to improve the world is not evident".
Answer:
gfUrsitd9yd97r96r6d9ydysotsoydpudpuxoydots9yd9ysits0y
<span>Provides federal funding to help eliminate the backlog of un analyzed DNA samples
</span>
<span>The Innocence Protection Act (IPA)1 is a
package of criminal justice reforms that aimed at reducing the prevalent risk that
innocent persons may be executed by the State, due to lack of DNA testing and to ensure that wrongfully convicted citizens may access evidence that may lead to their innocence.</span>
<span>The main responsibility given to the Caliph in the first duty is to protect the entire faith of Islam, in a manner that represents the wishes of the very first Muslims. </span>
