Max’s distance : Dave’s distance = 2 km : 5 km = 2:5
Max’s time : Dave’s time = 40 min : 15 min = 40:15 = 8:3
I think the permeate would be 8cm, correct me I’m I’m wrong. Sorry if I got the answer incorrect
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Factor all the factors making up the square root.
108: 2*2*3*3*3
a^7: a*a*a*a*a*a*a
b^5:b * b * b * b * b
The rule for taking a square root of this is
For every pair, you get to take one number outside the root sign and throw the other one away.
2*3*a * a * a* b * b√(3*a * b)
6a^3b^2 * √(3*a*b)
Answer:
Multiply four by four since each dollar is composed of four quarters.
Step-by-step explanation:
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
