1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
5

For a class assignment that students are to complete individually, Student A and Student B decide to collaborate. Student A comp

iles research notes while Student B identifies the main findings. Both write their own original research papers, and neither cite the other's work. Is this:
-Unethical collaboration
-Plagiarism
-Both unethical collaboration and plagiarism
-Acceptable collaboration
Social Studies
1 answer:
Phantasy [73]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: -Both unethical collaboration and plagiarism

Explanation:

Plagiarism refers to no giving credit when credit is due, like collecting information from someone else and presenting it as our own.

Unethical collaboration happens when students work together but then present written work as if only one of them worked on it.

In this example, not only the students decide to collaborate on an assignment they know is supposed to be done individually, but also neither of them cites the other's work.

You might be interested in
Which type of government allow citizens to have the greatest amount of political influence
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

A democracy

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is the recommended method for attaching a haul line to a firearm? tie it to the sling. tie it to the barrel. tie it to the
Lilit [14]

The answer would be tie it to the sling. 
This is to make sure it is empty and that you haul it up with the barrel pointing down. If by coincidental you let it down to quick and it smashes the ground check the barrel for mud or grass. Put a piece of black electric tape over the muzzle when hauling the rifle up or down from a standpoint. 

7 0
4 years ago
Is there a connection between territorial expansion and human sacrifices?
patriot [66]

Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.

Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.

I mean.

They're both in history and ''practiced''.

Though a connection, no,  Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.

6 0
3 years ago
A police officer visits Timothy and Evelyn's class to discuss safety rules. To attract the children's attention, the officer bri
MArishka [77]

Answer:

relevant

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand it seems that Timothey paid attention to what was relevant. This can be said because he told his parents all the safety rules that the police officer discussed with them and not about the balloons. Therefore mentioning all the relevant information pertaining to the officers visit.

If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

3 0
4 years ago
Deana became interested in joining the debate club at age 14 because she enjoyed pointing out contradictions and inconsistencies
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

Mental operations  

Explanation:

Mental operations: The term mental operations is defined by Jean Piaget at a developmental level and by J. P. Guilford from a psychometric perspective.

According to Jean Piaget, mental operations are referred to as the operations that can affect an individual's mental contents. In other words, an individual can imagine precisely the consequence or result of any phenomenon which is happening without the requirement of happening.

An individual having mental operations doesn't think rationally about abstract phenomena.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Blake is 28 years old and hasn't settled down. He has started college twice and quit, unsure of what career would suit his perso
    13·1 answer
  • The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution called for a new system of government that could "promote the general welfare." Which of t
    10·2 answers
  • Below are four common misconceptions about mapping an argument. Choose any two and briefly explain why each is wrong. When makin
    11·1 answer
  • Firstcomers to a forum discussion are most likely to cause problems by
    14·1 answer
  • In __________ research, data is collected on a sample of people on a single occasion. Then, the researcher examines potential re
    5·1 answer
  • Who is Gen Muhammad Buhari?
    12·2 answers
  • How many federal courts of appeal are there?
    6·1 answer
  • The public relations activity that involves enhancement of communication between investor-owned companies and their shareholders
    13·1 answer
  • 3 things about geography New England
    10·1 answer
  • Helppppppppppp????????????????????????
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!