Answer: Decrease, decrease
Explanation: Substitute goods are those goods that are used in place of each other. When the price of a substitute good falls, it becomes more attractive to the consumers. Here, wood planks and wood beams are substitutes to each other. So, when price of wood plank falls, demand for wood beams will decrease, shifting the demand curve to the left. As a result, of this the equilibrium price of wood beams and the quantity of wood beams will also decrease.
Answer:
The owner's equity be as of December 31, 20Y7 is $705
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the accounting equation which is given below
Total assets = Total liabilities + shareholder's equity
The question has said that the liabilities are decreased and the assets are increased.
So, the new asset is = total assets + increased amount
= $1,000 + $130
= $1,130
And, So, the new liability is = total liabilities - decreased amount
= $450 - $25
= $425
So, the shareholder equity would be equal to
= $1,130 - $425
= $705
Hence, the owner's equity be as of December 31, 20Y7 is $705
Answer:
Present value (PV) = $1,000
Interest rate (r) =8% = 0.08
Number of years (n) = 18 months = 1.5 years
No of compounding periods in a year = 4
Future value (FV) = ?
FV = PV(1 + r/m)nm
FV = $1,000(1 + 0.08/4)1.5x4
FV = $1,000(1 + 0.02)6
FV = $1,000 x 1.1262
FV = $1,126
Explanation:
The amount to be received in 18 months is $1,126. This is obtained by compounding the present value at 8% compounded quarterly for 18 months. The formula to be applied is the formula for future value of a lump sum(single investment).
Answer:
The answer is created a first-place science fair project.
Explanation:
When writing a resume, we usually refrain from using subjects when explaining our past work experiences and achievements. Generally, we focus on using verbs in past tense to explain what we have managed to do in these contexts. More specifically, it is preferred to use action verbs since our resume is supposed to give an explanation on what we have done in the past.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
