Answer:
No
Explanation:
This does not violate the expenditure = output identity because this idenity says that goods-in-stock /unsold goods produced and ready for sale but not yet sold (inventory) are also a part of output, which if sold in the next accounting period, would still be calculated as sale in the current period, since it is the sale of output produced in the current year.
Answer:
$45,000
Explanation:
For computation of Carrot’s capital loss carryover to 2018 first we need to figure out some steps which is shown below:-
Step 1
Net Capital Loss = Net Short Term Capital Gain -2017 - Net Long Term Capital Loss -2017
= $65,000 - $250,000
= -$185,000
Here, Net Capital Loss amount $185,000 which is not deductible in year 2017, but can be carried back to the three preceding years i.e. 2014, 2015 and 2016
Step 2
Net Capital Loss is set off in preceding years = Net Short Term Capital Gain - 2014 + Net Short Term Capital Gain 2015 + Net Short Term Capital Gain - 2016
= $60,000 + $45,000 + $35,000
= $140,000
and finally
Amount of loss Carryover to 2018 = Net Capital Loss - Net Capital Loss is set off in preceding years
= $185,000 - $140,000
= $45,000
Answer:
There will be no recorded change because the equity method comes into play from the acquisition date
Explanation:
In the event that Hawkins Company purchases or acquires another 30 percent of Larker, Inc. to add to their initial 10 percent holding, there will be no change in the investor report. This is because using the equity method, any investor report only starts taking into effect from the day the acquisition was made. Older statements and reports are not tampered with, as the investor did not have up to 40% of the company at that point in time.
Answer and Explanation:
We will start from the point where the manager has three options over here we see that the payoffs for doing nothing is $110000, $160000 for subcontracting and $120000 for 2 machines bought, in this case subcontracting gives the best outcome of $160000.
Now if we move back on decision tree where two machines are bought and if demand is low then payoff is 0.2 * 80000 + 0.8 * 160000 for high demand = 16000 + 128000 = $144000.
Now if decide to buy only one machine then the payoff are 0.2 * 100000 + 0.8* 160000 (value for subcontracting)
= 20000 + 128000 = $148000
In case of event 1 we can see the benefits can be either $144000 or $148000 calculated above.
Se we see the best outcome is when the manager subcontracts and the benefit is $160000.
Best option is to buy no machines and the expected payoff is $160000.
Answer:
A. Personal effort
D. Network of relationships
Explanation:
There are many forms of power in organizations, based on the provided answers the two that are examples would be Personal Effort and Network of relationships. One's personal effort helps them climb in an organization and gain power along the way through their hard work. While on the other hand, having a network of relationships grants power by opening doors to opportunities that may not otherwise be available, simply because of someone else in a specific situation.
