Answer:
c. results in either of two directions can lead to rejection of the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
A two tailed test is performed when we want to test if there is statistically significant difference from the null state. That means that if the statistic value is significantly higher or significantly lower, we will reject the null hypothesis. Both tails have rejection areas.
The function is

, and according to the description of the function in the problem statement, we have the following:
at t=0 after being thrown (that is, at initial time), the height of the ball is calculated by h(0) as follows:

(ft), which is the initial height, as expected.
At t=1 (sec), the height would be

.
etc.
The path is parabolic, as we know by seeing that the function is a quadratic polynomial function. This function has been given in factored form as well. From that we can see that the zeros of the function are t=7 and t=-2.
This means that at t=7 sec, the height h is 0, which means that the ball has hit the ground. t=-2 has no significance in the context of our problem so we just neglect it.
Answer: B) 7 sec
2. 653.5 m^3
3. 706.9 m^3
4. 141.4 m^3
5. 2309.1 m^3
6. 402.1 m^3
7. 1900.1 m^3
8. 2001.2 m^3
9. 461.8 m^3
Answer:
you got this your smart
Step-by-step explanation:
Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.
p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial
This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.
Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.
(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)
This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.
Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>