Answer:
The Rex’s gross income from the partnership in 2019 and 2020 is $1,20,000 and $1,80,000 respectively
Explanation:
The computation of the gross income for each year is shown below:
In 2019:
Gross income = Taxable income × percentage of interest in profits
= $400,000 × 30%
= $1,20,000
In 2020:
Gross income = Taxable income × percentage of interest in profits
= $600,000 × 30%
= $1,80,000
The withdrawn amount is not consider for computing the gross income. So, we ignored it
Answer: Candidates are not getting timely feedback about their applications.
Explanation:
From the information provided in the question, we realize that Antoine has a team of knowledgeable, and ethical recruiters at Luvia Insurance.
Despite this, Antoine observed that the number of applicants who accept offers has reduced and he realized that developed an unfavorable opinion of Luvia Insurance.
The most likely reason for this is that the candidates do not getting timely feedback about their applications. In a case whereby this occurs, the applicants would go to other companies who have reviewed their applications quicker and they've gotten a feedback from on time.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on all the answers that were provided the statement that is correct is that the bid price in a hostile takeover is generally above the price before the takeover attempt is announced, because otherwise there would be no incentive for the stockholders to sell to the hostile bidder and the takeover attempt would probably fail. Which pretty much explains itself, except for that a hostile takeover is when a person or another business tries to purchase a business by going directly to the shareholders themselves.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer that I choose was false
Answer:
The three brand are famous soft drink brands utilized by individuals. It very well may be somewhat muddled for deciding the favored taste of the buyers. This exploratory plan is flawed as a result of the potential issues engaged with it. The test here is that the members may not give an exact rating. They may rate it the equivalent. There is an issue with this trial as one of the soft drinks going level may affect the rating of the members. As indicated by Malhotra (2010) the most widely recognized strategy utilized for testing is combined correlation. This can be utilized by the members for successful examination.
The perplexing variable in the investigation incorporates the measure of time that went between the tasting of various soft drinks. The temperature of the soft drink additionally indicates the inclination of the members.
The measure of time that has gone since the members had the beverage likewise chooses their inclination level.
I would utilize correlation strategy wherein irregular examining will be picked. The refrigerated soft drinks will be given. A sense of taste chemical will be given after each drink to clean their taste. This will incorporate in excess of five preliminaries for effectiveness.
