Answer:
Because the Enlightenment believed that concepts related to the reform of the modern state would promote more economic and political freedom to citizens.
Explanation:
Modern state is the term used to describe the union of European feuds, which were finalized at the end of feudalism. Modern states had a more abtangent political structure that benefits citizens, but this structure was still exploratory, mainly because of the people's duties towards the monarchy. It was necessary for modern states to undergo economic, political and social reform, so that citizens could actually have economic and political freedom. This kind of freedom was strongly advocated by the Enlightenment, who believed that they could contribute to the management of modern states if those states underwent this reform and people could, in fact, live fully.
They worked in factories, when the men left the women picked up the slack and the production.
Answer:
It was Thomas Jefferson the secretary of the state at that time,along with his anti-federalists supporters who opposed the plan proposed by Alexander Hamilton.
Explanation:
- <u>Commercial Industrialization</u>
According to the plan proposed by Hamilton the federal government will hold more power, as it will increase its capacity to implement more policies easily and will eventually make the public powerless.
While, Jefferson did not wanted it that way as he proposed another road map to run the state, he proposed to give more power to the public or we can say to the free people of the United States.
Court decision in the trail of John Peter Zenger ( 1735) and the case of New York Times co. v. United States 1971 strengthened the<em> freedom of the press, </em>guaranteed by the First Amendment.
<em>John Peter Zenge</em>r was arrested for printing a publication in<em> The New York</em> <em>Weekly Journal.</em> It accused the governor<em> William S. Cosby</em> of corruption, rigging elections and crimes. Zenger only printed the articles without revealing the names of the authors. He was proved innocent by the jury that admitted his right to print allegations that yet had to be proved right or wrong.
The court ruling in the case of <em>New York Times co. v. United States</em> made it possible for <em>The New York Times </em>and<em> The Washington Post </em>newspapers to print the classified<em> Pentagon Papers </em>without the risk of government censorship.