Change the fraction into a decimal
No they wont have the same amount of money ana has more than jose and he’s spending more and wont have enough for the whole week, while ana will have enough and she’s only wasting 4$....
Mike is driving 20 miles per hour
If he is driving 10 miles in 30 mins
(1/2 an hour) if you times both by two it tells you the MPH that Mike is driving.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:-16x^2 + 24x + 16 = 0.
A. Divide by 8:
-2x^2 + 3x + 2 = 0, A*C = -2*2 = -4 = -1 * 4. Sum = -1 + 4 = 3 = B, -2x^2 + (-x+4x) + 2 = 0,
(-2x^2-x) + (4x+2) = 0,
-x(2x+1) + 2(2x+1) = 0,
(2x+1)(-x+2) = 0, 2x+1 = 0, X = -1/2. -x+2 = 0, X = 2.
X-intercepts: (-1/2,0), (2,0).
B. Since the coefficient of x^2 is negative, the parabola opens downward. Therefore, the vertex is a maximum.
Locate the vertex: h = Xv = -B/2A = -24/-32 = 3/4, Plug 3/4 into the given Eq to find k(Yv). K = -16(3/4)^2 + 16(3/4) + 16 = 19. V(h,k) = V(3/4,19).
C. Choose 3 points above and below the vertex for graphing. Include the points calculated in part A which shows where the graph crosses the x-axis.
Answer:
2.5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
The relation between time, speed, and distance is ...
distance = speed × time
We can define t to be Stanley's swimming time. Then t+0.5 was his running time, and 2(t+0.5) was his biking time. His total distance covered is ...
64 = 9(t +0.5) +16(2(t +0.5)) +2.5(t)
64 = 43.5t +20.5 . . . . . . . simplify
43.5 = 43.5t . . . . . . . . . subtract 20.5
t = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by the coefficient of t
Stanley swam for 1 hour, so the distance he covered while swimming was ...
(2.5 mi/h)(1 h) = 2.5 mi
Stanley covered 2.5 miles while swimming.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Stanley ran for 1.5 hours, covering 9×1.5 = 13.5 miles. He biked for 3 hours, covering 16×3 = 48 miles. His total distance was 2.5 +13.5 +48 = 64 miles, as given.
