1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lord [1]
3 years ago
8

After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, governments within the United States raised expenditures to increase security

at airports. These purchases of goods and services are a. not included in GDP since they do not represent production. b. not included in GDP since the government collects taxes to pay for them. c. included in GDP since government expenditures on goods and services are included in GDP.
Business
1 answer:
Tom [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

These purchases of goods and services are included in GDP since government expenditures on goods and services are included in GDP.

Explanation:

The equation used to calculate the GDP is:

GDP = C + I + G + (X – M)

GDP = consumption + investment + government expenditures + (exports – imports)

The G represents government consumption expenditure and gross investment. Governments spend money on equipment, infrastructure, and payroll.

As in this case in wich government raised expenditures to increase security at airports.

You might be interested in
Agent Higgins helps Mrs. O'Malley to enroll in AB Medicare Advantage (MA) plan during the Annual Open Enrollment Period. Mrs. O'
Neko [114]

Answer:

Since Mrs. O'Malley disenrolled form the plan because she was moving away to a location that was not served by the company, Agent Higgins compensation should not be affected.

If Mrs. O'Malley (or any other client) leaves the plan before the 3 month period because she decides to go back to her former provider since she doesn't like this plan (for whatever personal reason), then the company would be able to recoup Agent Higgins's compensation.

4 0
3 years ago
Marko, Inc., is considering the purchase of ABC Co. Marko believes that ABC Co. can generate cash flows of $5,700, $10,700, and
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

Total PV= $26,176.63

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Cash flow:

Cf1= $5,700

Cf2= $10,700

Cf3= $16,900

<u>To calculate the price of the investment now, we need to use the following formula on each cash flow:</u>

PV= Cf / (1+i)^n

PV1= 5,700/1.11= 5,135.14

PV2= 10,700/1.11^2= 8,684.36

PV3= 16,900/1.11^3= 12,357.13

Total PV= $26,176.63

7 0
2 years ago
The depreciation tax shield is best defined as the:
lesantik [10]
Is best defined as the amount of tax that is saved because of the depreciation expense.
7 0
3 years ago
You have a team that has high cultural diversity and high interdependence, increasing the risk of disagreements in the team. Kno
Dominik [7]

Answer:

A. Conflict resolution abilities

Explanation:

Conflict resolution ability is the capacity of a person or group of persons to effectively handle and manage the conflicts of interest or disagreement between two or more persons or two or more groups.

There are several skills used by people who have conflict resolution abilities such as COMMUNICATION, COMPROMISE, COLLABORATION, ACCOMMODATION ETC.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Abby consumes only apples. In year1, red apples cost $1 each, green apples cost $2 each, and Abby buys 10 red apples. In year 2,
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

Part A)  

Consumer price index is an amount of the average variation over time in the amounts paid by customers for a market basket of customer goods and services.

CPI= (Updated Cost/Base Period Cost) x 100

For multiple products, we have to ruminate the weights or proportion of expenditure of an item

CPI2= (P2Red xQ1Red) + (P2grn x Q1grn) / (P1Red xQ1Red) + (P1grn x Q1grn)

CPI2= (2 x 10) + (1x0)/ (1x10) + (2x0)

CPI2= 2

Based on the CPI in year 2, prices have doubled.

Part B)

Nominal expenditure is the total worth of outcome produced or expended in each year.

In year 1 and year 2, Abby buys

Year 1= $1 x 10= $10

Year 2= $1 x 10= $10

So, nominal expenditure remains constant at $10.

Part C)

Real expenditure is the quantity consumed or the basket in the current year calculated at the base year price.

Base year prices: Red $1& Green $2

Real expenditure in year 1  = (P1rQ1r) + (P1gQ1g)

                                               =$1x10 + X2x0

                                               = $10

Real expenditure in year 2  = (P1rQ2r) + (P1gQ2g)

                                       = (1x 0) + (2 x 10)

                                       = $20

So, real expenditure has increased from $10 to $20

Part D).

Implicit value deflator in year 1, it is the base year so it will be continuously 1 as the actual and nominal amounts are equal.

Implicit price deflator in year  = nominal expenditure/real expenditure

Implicit price deflator in year 1 = 10/10

                                                = 1

Implicit price deflator in year2  = 10/20

                                                = 0.5

Thus, the implicit value deflator proposes that prices have dropped by half. The cause for this is that the deflator evaluations how much Abby standards her appeals using prices dominant in year 1.

We can perceive from this perception that the green apples are appreciated more .And when Abby consumes more green apples in year 2, it appears that her consumption has augmented as the price deflator standards green apples more than the red apples.

Part E)

Abby considers that red apples and green apples as perfect alternatives, then the cost of living in this budget has not changed in both year it costs $10 to eat 10 apples.

Permitting to the CPl, however, the cost of living has gathered. This is because it only takes into justification the detail that the red apple price has gathered; the CPl overlooks the fall in the price of green apples as they were not in the consumption package in year 1.

In difference to the CPI, the implicit value deflator approximations the cost of living has shared.

CPI is calculated based on the Laspreyers Index method, where the amount in the numerator is the amount in the base year. Where as in the Passche price index, the numerator is the Recent price calculated for current capacity of consumption.

The Laspeyres index inclines to exaggerate rise (in a cost of living framework), while the Paasche index tends to understate it, because the indices do not account for the fact that consumers typically react to value variations by changing the amounts that they buy. For example, if prices go up for good X then, at ceteris paribus, amounts of that good should go downcast.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A graduate student wants to examine the effect of print media versus televised media on individuals' position on several social
    15·1 answer
  • A car manufacturer is concerned about poor customer satisfaction at one of its dealerships. the management decides to evaluate t
    11·1 answer
  • Hagos Corporation is working on its direct labor budget for the next two months. Each unit of output requires 0.84 direct labor-
    15·1 answer
  • Budweiser is a popular brand of beer. Part of this company's market research of U.S. consumers looked at education levels of bee
    14·1 answer
  • ________ involves defining the firm's marketing mix variables so that target customers have a clear, distinctive, desirable unde
    11·1 answer
  • What are characteristics of a good service provider​ operations?
    12·1 answer
  • Work Survival skills include?
    11·1 answer
  • State the following statement is True or False, and explain why. Thor who lives in Montana purchased a car produced in Japan for
    12·1 answer
  • You need a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage to buy a new home for $280,000. Your mortgage bank will lend you the money at an APR of
    9·1 answer
  • If you started your own company selling iphone applications, what organizational structure would you create? why?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!