Answer:
I think the word <u>ethic</u> is the answer.
Answer:
Migrate from one region to another
Explanation:
Famine -food scarcity-, warfare -war situations-, and religious persecution have most often influenced people’s decisions to <u>migrate from one region to another.</u>
For centuries, <em>people have migrated from one region to another to escape from tough situations like food scarcity, war, racism, lack of opportunities, religious persecution</em>, amongst many others.
Migration can permit an individual or group of individuals (family) to have access to better opportunities and live a better-quality life.
Answer: A) Unprejudiced discriminator
Explanation: A unprejudiced discriminator is one who have no preconceived opinion (prejudice) of his or her own but will usually indulge in discrimination when ever the opportunity presents itself.
According to Merton's classification, an unprejudiced discriminator is free from any form of prejudice but when the opportunity presents itself, when it's profitable or justifiable, they will discriminate against others.
Roger's action against Thanh Li makes him an unprejudiced discriminator.
The evolution of social mores in the 1920s is probably one of the most impactful aspect of the Roaring 20s.
While these changes were primarily centered in the urban areas of the United States, they allowed people to begin to move past restrictive Protestant moral values and move to a more open society.
This was done in combination with the explosion of cultural contributions made by African-Americans, centered around the Harlem Renaissance.
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
