1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tamaranim1 [39]
3 years ago
8

A convention is best described as ____________.

History
2 answers:
tatiyna3 years ago
6 0
Conventions are meeting that delegates have one famous convention is the constitutional convention. And if your talking about the fun conventions like the science ones or beauty conventions those are like party anyone is invited to
katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A formal meeting of delegates and representatives, is the right answer.

Explanation:

A convention, in the understanding of a conference, is a gathering of people who assemble at an organised area and time to address or involve in some public interest. However, in politics, many sovereign nations have prerequisites for conventions besides their perpetual legislature. In such conventions, delegates or the representatives of the states are asked to a unique meeting to address the common interests.

You might be interested in
Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He also wrote that, “no man can wr
Maurinko [17]

Answer:SINCE I have taken upon myself to narrate the public and private life, and no small part of the deeds, of my lord and foster-father, the most lent and most justly renowned King Charles, I have condensed the matter into as brief a form as possible. I have been careful not to omit any facts that could come to my knowledge, but at the same time not to offend by a prolix style those minds that despise everything modern, if one can possibly avoid offending by a new work men who seem to despise also the masterpieces of antiquity, the works of most learned and luminous writers. Very many of them, l have no doubt, are men devoted to a life of literary leisure, who feel that the affairs of the present generation ought not to be passed by, and who do not consider everything done today as unworthy of mention and deserving to be given over to silence and oblivion , but are nevertheless seduced by lust of immortality to celebrate the glorious deeds of other times by some sort of composition rather than to deprive posterity of the mention of their own names by not writing at all.

Be this as it may, I see no reason why I should refrain from entering upon a task of this kind, since no man can write with more accuracy than I of events that took place about me, and of facts concerning which I had personal knowledge, ocular demonstration as the saying goes, and I have no means of ascertaining whether or not any one else has the subject in hand.

In any event, I would rather commit my story to writing, and hand it down to posterity in partnership with others, so to speak, than to suffer the most glorious life of this most excellent king, the greatest of all the princes of his day, and his illustrious deeds, hard for men of later times to imitate, to be wrapped in the darkness of oblivion.

But there are still other reasons, neither unwarrantable nor insufficient, in my opinion, that urge me to write on this subject, namely, the care that King Charles bestowed upon me in my childhood, and my constant friendship with himself and his children after I took up my abode at court. In this way he strongly endeared me to himself, and made me greatly his debtor as well in death as in life, so that were I unmindful of the benefits conferred upon me, to keep silence concerning the most glorious and illustrious deeds of a man who claims so much at my hands, and suffer his life to lack due eulogy and written memorial, as if he had never lived, I should deservedly appear ungrateful, and be so considered, albeit my powers are feeble, scanty, next to nothing indeed, and not at all adapted to write and set forth a life that would tax the eloquence of a Tully [note: Tully is Marcus Tullius Cicero].

I submit the book. It contains the history of a very great and distinguished man; but there is nothing in it to wonder at besides his deeds, except the fact that I, who am a barbarian, and very little versed in the Roman language, seem to suppose myself capable of writing gracefully and respectably in Latin, and to carry my presumption so far as to disdain the sentiment that Cicero is said in the first book of the Tusculan Disputations to have expressed when speaking of the Latin authors. His words are: "It is an outrageous abuse both of time and literature for a man to commit his thoughts to writing without having the ability either to arrange them or elucidate them, or attract readers by some charm of style." This dictum of the famous orator might have deterred me from writing if I had not made up my mind that it was better to risk the opinions of the world, and put my little talents for composition to the test, than to slight the memory of so great a man for the sake of sparing myself.

Explanation:

did report made 93.6 plz mark brainist

4 0
3 years ago
In the Islamic religion a disagreement about Muhammad's successor led to what?
prisoha [69]
The religion splitting into two major branches, the shiite and the sunni.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the League of Nations established?
allsm [11]

Answer:

1919

Explanation:

The League's goals included disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation diplomacy and improving global welfare

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened when Hoover ordered the removal of the bonus army
Doss [256]

Answer:

Bonus Army expelled, July 28, 1932. On this day in 1932, William Mitchell, the U.S. attorney general, ordered tens of thousands of World War I veterans and their families removed from government property. ... When told of the violence, President Herbert Hoover ordered the army to clear the veterans' campsite.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What is Max Weber theory related to sociologist ?
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

Methodology. Sociology, for Max Weber, is "a science which attempts the interpretive understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects."

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A person who holds duties rights and responsibilities within a state is called a
    5·1 answer
  • Which group has been an example for successfully determining the amount and price of a world-wide commodity? A) The European Uni
    7·2 answers
  • How did the bill of rights legally change the political system
    7·1 answer
  • When was the lightbulb made
    15·2 answers
  • MULTI-CHOICE QUESTION:  "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included wi
    15·2 answers
  • If im being honest i dont rlly know the subject but the class its under is history SO THATS WHAT IM PICKING...C:
    11·1 answer
  • What do you call the process of spreading new knowledge and skill to other cultures?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the Counter-Reformation?
    7·2 answers
  • Please help i’m lost
    14·1 answer
  • Select TWO sentences from below that show Lincoln's optimism regarding the outcome of the war.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!