Answer: Interestingly enough, there has always been a Wilsonian strain in American foreign policy, an idealistic belief in self-determination, and in some ways it was suppressed during the Cold War ”1 Thus, contrary to President Wilson’s ideas and the public opinion of the early 1900s, war still exists and will continue to exist. However, the objectives, or at least the public’s perceptions of American foreign policy, have taken on a new role. Americans have typically been idealists. Idealism has been present in the American mindset from its founding days and to an extent in American foreign policy; however, under President Wilson’s leadership, idealism took on an expanded role in American foreign policy.
Woodrow Wilson said on the eve of his inauguration “that his primary interests were in domestic reform and that it would be ‘the irony of fate’ if he should be compelled to concentrate on foreign affairs.”2 Fate would have it that President Wilson would lead the United States through the greatest war the world had ever seen. Although Wilson had limited leadership experience in foreign affairs in 1914 when war broke out in Europe, he knew how things should take place.
Explanation:
i looked it up:)
President Theodore Roosevelt's commitment to the proverb, "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far," was most clearly shown when he (2) intervened in Latin American affairs. Roosevelt was largely involved with the affairs of Venezuela, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia and Cuba. Although he wasn't as aggressive as other presidents had been, he left on the table that he would protect the United States as best as he could if anything should happen.
Many consider the French revolution as the being the spearhead of the modern politic.
* The revolution single handedly crushed the monarchical way of politics, the aristocratic domination up to that point in France, and church domination of French politics.
*The revolution furthermore abolished the feudal system and was one of the biggest steps towards modernity through out history.
*The revolution was a successful endeavour on the part of the French people because it reformed social tradition @and the hierarchy of France.
*Aristocracy by making all men equal and the enlightenment ideals which the revolution was based on came through to a great extent and in this way the French revolution was a success
THE HISTORY OF COLONIAL NORTH AMERICA centers
primarily around the struggle of England, France, and
Spain to gain control of the continent. Settlers
crossed the Atlantic for different reasons, and their
governments took different approaches to their colonizing
efforts. These differences created both advantages
and disadvantages that profoundly affected the
New World’s fate. France and Spain, for instance,
were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule
was absolute; their colonists went to America as servants
of the Crown. The English colonists, on the
other hand, enjoyed far more freedom and were able
to govern themselves as long as they followed English
law and were loyal to the king. In addition, unlike
France and Spain, England encouraged immigration
from other nations, thus boosting its colonial population.
By 1763 the English had established dominance
in North America, having defeated France and Spain
in the French and Indian War. However, those
regions that had been colonized by the French or
Spanish would retain national characteristics that
linger to this day
<span>Phone and utilities
Equipment
Fixtures
Inventory
Leasehold improvements
<span>Licenses and tax deposits
hope this helped :)
alisa202
plzz tell me if I was wrong</span></span>
