The silk road is an ancient overland trade route that connects China with Europe.
There is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
<h3>What happened in Plessy V Ferguson?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases of Plessy v. Ferguson upheld the Louisiana state law allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored race"
<h3>What happened in Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>
The ruling of the Supreme court in the cases Brown v. Board of Education favored Oliver Brown whose daughter was not allowed to attend a school near her home due to discriminate against the black students.
In conclusion, there is no key difference in both case because the Supreme court ruled against discrimination against the blacks.
Read more about blacks discrimination
<em>brainly.com/question/13608616</em>
The freeing of serfs in Russia was an expression of liberalism because it advocated individuals having personal freedom. As Alexander said to the nobles, "The existing condition of owning souls cannot remain unchanged."
However, what was done in freeing the serfs expressed conservatism because the arrangement ultimately favored the nobles, leaving half of the lands in their hands and requiring payment from the serfs to the nobles for any lands transferred to them.
Note: The Civil War in the USA began in the same year that the emancipation of serfs was proclaimed in Russia. Technically, serfdom in Russia was not the same as slavery in the United States. Landowners did not own the serfs as property, but because they were bound to the land as workers for the landowner who owned the land, their resulting situation was similar. And because they were given legal freedom but had to pay for any land they would acquire from the nobles, the cost of their freedom was high.
Answer:
Augusto Pinochet was a Chilean dictator, who held the de facto presidency of Chile between 1973 and 1990, through the imposition of a military regime that greatly limited the civil liberties of its citizens, carrying out an internal dirty war and a political persecution of leftist political parties. In economic matters, his government carried out liberal measures, seeking to ally himself with the Western Bloc in the framework of the Cold War.
Today, the majority of Chilean society considers that their government was bad, because of the constant human rights abuses committed in the country, where political opponents of their regime were tortured, kidnapped and murdered.
However, parts of the right in Chile still have a positive view of Pinochet. They recognize him for having contributed to economic development. Since the right did not like the development of Chile in the socialist leadership under Allende, the right also recognizes him for having interrupted this development.
Some political analysts believe that the Pinochet regime can be described as fascist, while others believe that Pinochet's liberal economic policies mean that the regime cannot be defined as fascist.
