A questionnaire item, distributed to a random sample of adults, reading "Are you not in support of nationalized health care", with a yes or no possible response, would violate the concept of "Avoid negative items."
Option d
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
While doing a research study the researcher has to formulate the questionnaire according to the field of research. In this type of questionnaire based data research, one has to give at most importance to the target audience whom the research is meant for.
To get better data from target group on has to develop a questionnaire which avoids the negative items because the target group should not be confused while giving their opinion.
So, before preparing a questionnaire one has to clearly study and understand the nature of group and their attitude towards the particular segment of research to avoid negative items.
I think that the best answer to this question is: Shark fin soup
. This is because making this soup will require the fishing for sharks, and the fishing for sharks has the potential for overfishing and will result in the possible disappearance of this species and possibly even some other related species.
The answer is "Social scientists
rely on "data collection", whereas lawyers rely on Experience and Intuition".
The Jury Selection and service act was
created in the year 1968 to form a fair cross-section of the society by assembling
juries by the federal and state courts.
<span> </span>
Answer:
there are several consequences of inequity and most times, the likelihood of occurence differs. a repercaution or consequence is that Jack will try to increase his outcomes by meeting his senior heads or increase in his pay and an option also of maximum use of company facilities and resources.
and also, he can also limit/reduce his inputs by working fewer hours and with low impact in giving his high performance. peradventure if these actions does not reduce his feelings of inequity drastically, it will be advisable for Jack to seach/look for a purchasing management job in another firm orhave a second though about going into a better and higher-paying jobs still within his current organization. Jack's feelings of inequity can be limited/reduce if he can change his perceptions, but this is more difficult given the clarity of salary information. It is also unlikely that Jack would push Sam to work harder or try to reduce his salary and also for Jack to change his comparison other can be difficult.
Explanation:
