There are 5 elements of the feasibility study:
1) Description - of items or services offered, delivered, overview
2) Market feasibility - is there a market? is the market worth entering?
3) Technial feasibility - how service will be delivered
4) Financial feasibility - funding needed for product or service to launch, what will they make from the product or service
5) Organizational feasibility - legal aspect of the business
In this case, market feasibility is the most important element because if there isn't a desire or market for the product or service, there is no reason to enter that market. If a market is not being entered, funding, legal aspects and knowing how to advertise/deliver the product is not necessary.
Answer: C. Scarcity
The situation is an example of scarcity.
Answer:
Self conscious about appearance
Explanation:
A minor is a usually adopted as term used to make distinction between an adult who can take up legal responsibilities and a child who legally below the specified age of the majority or adulthood. Distinction between minors and adulthood is usually based on the age of the individual. Person below the age of 18 in most countries are considered as minor. They possess certain characteristics which may include excessive consciousness about looks and trying to avoid eyes contact as much as possible.
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
