Answer:
I always loved this topic.
Explanation:
The German U-boats sank the Lusitania. The Lusitania was a passenger ship heading east. It was also heading into the area that a U-boat was in. Since the Albert Einstein Was German, when he accidentally made the nuclear Bomb, they used it. but they were using it in the U-boats, and they were sinking the ships that were bombers, and also the ships that were trading goods, because they were in the middle of the war. The U-boat hit the ship in the side, and it blew part of the ship up. So then, when the people tried to escape, the U-boats hit again, which gave them a 0.4% chance to escape, but they weren't able to. They were close to shore, but it made the other side angry and somewhat terrified, because they wouldn't be able to trade goods with other countries. It also let the people know that they were bombing, and they had the bombs, because when they hit the bomber ships, it was in the middle of the ocean. But because they were close to shore when they blew it up, they all saw it.
I really, really, hope this helps you and you get a good grade on this. Thank you!
I believe the answer to be A. The Confederacy could not seize federal property.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
Answer:
The information in the question is correct.
Internet access in Africa is on average, much lower than in Europe, and the rest of the world.
In some African countries like Eritrea, Burundi and Somalia, less than 2% of the total population have access to the internet, while Iceland, an European country, has an internet coverage of 100% of its population.
This low internet penetration in Africa is related to other socioeconomic variables such as lower per capita incomes, lower economic development, and higher social conflictivity.
