Answer:
true
Explanation:
According to my research on Kohlberg's theory of moral development, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this statement is completely true. This is because this theory talks about starting in a stage where your actions are done in order to avoid certain consequences. Then as you get older you progress through various ethical stages, developing a series of ethical principals.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Milk and syrup are two specific liquids
BRAINLIEST PLZ!!!!!
Answer:
Cultural formula
Explanation:
Cultural formula can be described as a situation there is tend to a consistent occurrence of certain roles and props in a series of media events.
Cultural formula can be employed in a novel through the use of certain roles for characters and props that go along with the genre.
Therefore, Chandler's novels followed a cultural formula.
The most common method used for training non-managerial employees is on the job training (OJT).
On-the-job training (OJT) is a hands-on approach to acquiring new competencies and skills required for work in a real work environment.
Often used to learn how to use a particular tool or equipment in a real work practice, simulation, or training environment.
Instead of showing employees presentations and handing out worksheets, employees learn about the job by doing it. This training takes place in the workplace under the direction of a supervisor, manager or other competent employee.
As part of the introduction phase, new employees will have a close look at all future work processes. They learn what to expect in the workplace, how to operate equipment, and other skills necessary to succeed on the job.
To know more about employees, visit:-
brainly.com/question/13405418
#SPJ4
Answer: Party B
Explanation:
Even though verbal agreements are enforceable by law, written agreements take precedent because they are more explicit than verbal agreements.
The written agreement will therefore be followed in this case and according to this agreement, A will be punished for the proposed action.
If A had tangible proof that a subsequent agreement was reached that would void them of said punishment, they should present it. If they do not, B would prevail.
