Answer:
Peak shift is a behavioral response bias arising from discrimination learning in which animals display a directional, but a limited, preference for , or avoidance of unusual stimuli. It's hypothesized evolutionary relevance has been primarily in the realm of aposematic coloration and limited sex dimorphism.
The analysis of the condition which behavioral contrast and peak shift occur suggested that both phenomenon were by-products of emotional responses that resulted from response suppression and that their disappearance after extended discrimination training could be attributed to the dissipation of such emotional response.
Explanation:
Answer:Alternatives
Explanation:According to him if a person has alternatives before acting,then the action is from free will..as long as there is no compulsion, or external agent imposing a decision on someone, then there is free will
Answer:
Some of its requirements forced them to abandon their traditional practices, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Indian Reorganization Act is also known as the Wheeler-Howard Act. Enacted on 18th June 1934, this act was a federal law of the United States which dealt with the status of the American Indians. The main goal of this Act was to modify the traditional goal of adaptation of Indians into the society of Americans and to encourage, promote and preserve the tribes and their traditional values and culture.
However, this act was rejected by many native American tribes on the grounds that some of its provisions forced them to evacuate their traditional customs.
The Minoan made a major impact on Western European civilization
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
