Answer:
B
Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)
Answer:
The following clause states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state"
a. The Full Faith and Credit Clause
Explanation:
- The option a is correct as the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution states that each state should give full faith and credit to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of any other state in the United State of America.
- The option b is incorrect as The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides safeguard against the discrimination for the people of a state in other state.
- The option c is incorrect as this clause is about commerce matters so it is irrelevant here.
- The option d is incorrect as this clause is related to the agreement between the parties so it is also irrelevant here.
- The option e is also incorrect as the this bill is about the rights of the public and many more so it is also irrelevant in the given situation.
Answer:
she should discuss options with the airport since she is only a pilot and the airport authorities should decide on the choices
Answer: deductive
Explanation:
Deductive method is one of the methods of reasoning, in which the consequences are deducted using general principles. The theorems are deducted from the definitions and postulates. In this previously know facts are also taken into consideration while deriving a conclusion.
According to the given situation, applying the studies on the effects of computer use to hypothesize for the effects of smartphone use involves the use of deductive method of reasoning. As here, previous knowledge is used to deduce a conclusion that is to understand the use of smartphone.
I do think that society should be doing more about corporate crime because these companies are taking large sums of money from people and other businesses, and potentially the government. ... Also, police could use the time saved to focus on more violent and pressing crimes.
