1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vanyuwa [196]
3 years ago
15

In what ways did economic competition between countries "come at the expense of others"? Select all correct answers.

History
2 answers:
ira [324]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The right answers are: D competition was intense for economic control and A Countries paid taxes to each other.

Explanation:

Economic competition can affect the other country because of its supply of goods. Since the colonies trafficked supplies in routes, this dealing will be broken through the obligation of higher taxes. For example, the product of a country produces cars while the other produces carpets. If a competition between the two countries exists, the tendency is that the carpet country will have to increase tax imposition with regards to their products and the cars country will find it very expensive to buy carpets from it hence losing much money. The car country may stop the trade of cars while the other will also experience damages by looking for another country supplier of cars. If the substitute they will get could not meet the same standard as the cars they will suffer damages and growth of prices because the demand for the car country which they cannot import any longer will increase.

vivado [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answers are: Countries paid taxes to each other and Competition was intense for economic control.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did some black men fight for British during the war of 1812?
lana66690 [7]

In 1813 Charles Ball, an escaped slave and self-declared “free man of color,” had a choice.  He could row out to the British fleet moored in the Chesapeake Bay and offer his services to the King, or he could volunteer for the fledgling American navy and defend his country.  Ball, whose dramatic bid for freedom is chronicled in The Life of Charles Ball, A Black Man, chose the latter and he was not alone.

Black Sailors during the War

When Ball enlisted, African Americans made up at least fifteen percent of U.S. naval corps.  Although official U.S. policy at the start of the war forbade the recruitment of black sailors, a chronic shortage of manpower compelled the navy to accept any able-bodied man.  These black sailors had a reputation for fierceness in battle.  When Captain Oliver Hazard Perry complained about having blacks on his ship, Commodore Isaac Chauncey replied, “I have nearly fifty blacks on this boat and many of them are among the best of my men.”  Perry soon had the chance to test Chauncey’s recommendation.  At the Battle of Lake Erie, where Perry’s fleet thwarted the British, his black sailors performed so well that he wrote to the Secretary of the Navy, praising their courage.

Life at sea was, by necessity,  an egalitarian existence.  Living in small quarters, away from shore for months at a time, the men developed a camaraderie and mutual respect based on performance, not skin color.  Black sailors made their mark on both official vessels and on the privateers, non-military ships sanctioned by the U.S. government to harass British merchant vessels. On some privateers more than half of the crew was black. These fast and heavily-armed raiders were frequently successful at seizing merchant ships, but just as frequently at being captured by the British.  The sailors onboard, including the African Americans, were often sent to the infamous Dartmoor Prison, where the racial divisions they had left behind once again prevailed.

Fighting for Both Sides in the War

Charles Ball, as a free man, was lucky enough to have a choice.  Besides the Navy and privateering, there were even a few black battalions in the American army.  But for most American slaves, the options were limited to the British navy.  When the British fleet arrived in the Chesapeake Bay in March 1813, entire families of slaves made their way by canoe to the enemy ships.  The British commanders had orders to welcome these refugee slaves, but also to take care not to encourage an outright rebellion against their white masters.  The British did not want insurrection among blacks to spread to their own slave-holding territories in the West Indies.

The slave owners, naturally, were furious at the loss of what they thought of as “property,” and sent delegations to the British demanding that the slaves be returned. Even Charles Ball, a former slave, tried to convince escaped slaves to come back to U.S. soil.  He “went amongst them” he records in his memoir, “And talked to them a long time, on the subject of returning home; but found that their heads were full of notions of liberty and happiness in some of the West India islands’.”

Ball would soon be fighting against some of the very black men he had tried to convince.  As a seaman and cook, he served in the Chesapeake Flotilla under Commodore Joshua Barney.  After Barney ordered the flotilla sunk to keep the boats our of the hands of the invading British, Ball marched to Bladensburg with Barney and served in one of his cannon crews.  His memoir describes what later came to be called the Bladensburg Races:

“I stood at my gun, until the Commodore was shot down, when he ordered us to retreat, as I was told by the officer who commanded our gun. If the militia regiments, that lay upon our right and left, could have been brought to charge the British, in close fight, as they crossed the bridge, we should have killed or taken the whole of them in a short time; but the militia ran like sheep chased by dogs.”

The British Promise of Freedom

Black soldiers and sailors were fighting valiantly on both sides of the war, but the British promise of freedom for slaves gave the British a distinct advantage in the competition for recruits. There was another advantage.  One British admiral suggested that a "Black Force … could be managed and kept within bounds, and the Terror of a Revolution in the Southern States increased to produce a good effect in that quarter."  

In April 1814 Vice-Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane made the British position official: All those who may be disposed to emigrate from the United States, will, with their Families, be received on board of His Majesty's Ships…. They will have their choice of either entering into His Majesty's Forces, or of being sent as FREE Settlers to British possessions, … where they will meet with all due encouragement.  Cochrane then ordered Rear-Admiral George Cockburn to form the Colonial Marines, fighting units made up of refugee slaves.


3 0
3 years ago
What are five major cold war events that occurred internationally between 1945 and 65
Kipish [7]

Answer:

The war between the Koreas in 1950

2- The man's arrival on the Moon in 1969.

3- The Vietnam War.

4- The arms race, the two poles representing capitalism, USA and socialism, USSR, had a huge arsenal of war.

5 - The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Help y’all<br> Who founded Carolina?
Savatey [412]

Answer:

Charles II

Explanation:

On 24 March 1663, Charles II issued a new charter to a group of eight English noblemen, granting them the land of Carolina, as a reward for their faithful support of his efforts to regain the throne of England. The eight were called Lords Proprietor or simply Proprietors.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help ME PLZ IDK JUST HELP ERRR
bogdanovich [222]
For 4, your best choice is: B) Americans were divided on the issue of fighting in vietnam...

Reason: While the louder speaking majority wanted peace (as they were tired of war), there was still a faction of people who believe it is best to continue to fight. President Nixon believed that these people were the majority, hence the name 'silent majority'. However, the peace group was able to win, with the withdrawal of US troops and the eventual takeover of South Vietnam by communist troops.

Main Idea and Details What did the Supreme Court mean by "seperate but equal?" Why did many people feel this idea was faulty?

Answer: The term "separate but equal" was initiated too help garner Southern support. The Supreme Court termed it so that the South can still segregate many of the public areas, as long as 'they have equal chances and are relatively the same.' However, this idea was faulty, because many believed that if it was separate, that it will still 'not be equal', as the people do not feel that they are treated the same. As long as they are separate and not equal, 'the people will not feel that it is the same'. 


hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
What treaties contributed to US involvement in the Vietnam War?
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

Vietnam War and active U.S. involvement in the war began in 1954, though ... The subsequent treaty signed in July 1954 at a Geneva conference split ... tons of bombs on neighboring, neutral Laos during the CIA-led “Secret War” in Laos.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following most symbolized wealth to early immigrants?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do you think the lynching of emmett till became a catalyst in the national movement for civil rights?
    8·1 answer
  • Did Mr. Williamson agree with slavery? If not... why did he not agree?
    5·1 answer
  • Hellppppp!!!! 20 points best answer gets brainliest!!!!!!!! <br><br> Thank you!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What did every neighborhood in muslim cities have
    5·2 answers
  • 1. From 1860-1900 which of the following most characterized society in Texas?
    9·1 answer
  • The Warsaw Pact was a union of (5 points)
    9·1 answer
  • Merits of communication
    14·1 answer
  • What was the Nanjing Massacre and how did people in the United States react to it?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did workers organize strikes in the early 1800s?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!