The distribution shows that 91% which is pretty much the very high-end were earning below $1,200 a year which means they were turning that much and we can infer that in the 18th there were people with a very poor background and technology want advance at that time and outcome of that would be people would be very poor and in this
It also showed that there were only 9% of people who are earning above $1,200 and this shows that not many people would have earned that but due to the background the amount of job opportunity the wages the seller which which all contribute and in this scenario
There are four option but the correct answer would be A as it also shows that not many people that much then having a poor background is a very good explanation to put this through. you you also tells that only a minority and above $1,200
So the correct answer is A
For the first question, the options are:
one’s feelings about oneself
environmental and fam<span>ily stresses
the behavior of friends
the behavior of admired celebrities
The key word in this question is "internal", it's looking for internal influence. This means:
</span>
one’s feelings about oneself
The second question has the options:
<span>a parent’s behavior
one’s past experiences
one’s social tendencies
one’s personality
Here you need an "external" influence: this would be the following option: </span>
<span>a parent’s behavior </span>
Roman Egypt<span>, </span>settlements<span>, </span>population distribution<span>, </span>population<span> ... It is probable that </span>ancient<span> society was heavily urbanized, at least by pre-industrial standards. ... </span>Three<span> types of </span>settlement<span> existed: poleis, metropoleis, and komai, which are .... for practical </span>reasons<span>: single figures lend themselves to easy comparison.</span>
The factors that influence when and if a person experiences symptoms from a particular exposure are :
- The amount of time you come in contact which has an effect
- The complementary symptoms that occur
I believe the answer is: Predict the outcomes of experiments before they are told the actual results.
By making them predicting the outcome of the experiment, dr. donelian would expose them with the fact that their prediction would often be wrong. After experiencing this, the students would no longer see the experiment as 'documenting the obvious'
