Something not to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education is: c. the type of food that is offered on the meal plan.
<h3>What is rate of return?</h3>
Rate of return can be defined as a net gain (profit) or loss that is associated with an investment over a specified period of time, and it's usually expressed as a percentage of the investment's initial cost.
This ultimately implies that, the rate of return must be higher than the rate of inflation in order for any business firm or individual to earn money on their investments.
Also, a positive return on investment (ROI) entails a net gain (profit) from an investment over a specified period of time. This ultimately implies that, the type of food that is offered on the meal plan isn't something to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education.
Read more on return on investment here: brainly.com/question/23603222
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which of these is not something to consider when trying to get a positive return on investment (ROI) for higher education?
a. The cost of attendance.
b. The financial aid package that is offered to you.
c. The type of food that is offered on the meal plan.
d. Your expected career income.
Demand.
If you found this especially helpful, I'd appreciate if you'd vote me Brainliest for your answer. I want to be able to assist more users one-on-one, as well as to move up in rank! :)
Answer:
Product Cost Variable Or fixed Direct or indirect
1. Rubber core for soccer ball Variable Direct
2. Thread to hold leather together Variable Indirect
3. Taxes on factory Fixed Indirect
4. Wages on Assembly workers Variable Direct
5. Machinery depreciation Fixed Indirect
6. Annual flat fees paid for office security Fixed Indirect
7. Leather cover for soccer balls Variable
Answer:
Ask your question <u>properly</u>
<u>and </u><u>also </u><u>follow </u><u>me </u>
Answer:
Hazel will have to pay Jill $750 for his remaining life because Hazel had received something which is very expensive in return in compensation of his lifetime monthly payments of $750 to Jill. So this means that the 100% contract is enforceable.
The contract formation can be proved in the court because when Hazel will say that the contract is not written so according to Statute of Fraud he is not liable to pay Jill. This means he is agreeing at the point that the contract was in place.
