All categories

3 years ago

Which statement is true about setting up a proportion to solve for the missing measure?

Mathematics

2 answers:

VMariaS [17]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:B Corresponding parts must be in the same position.

Step-by-step explanation:Consider the enlargement of the triangle.

A smaller triangle with side lengths 9 millimeters and 6 millimeters. A larger triangle with side lengths x millimeters and 16 millimeters.

Which statement is true about setting up a proportion to solve for the missing measure?

Corresponding parts must be in different positions.

Corresponding parts must be in the same position.

The two ratios are not equal.

The enlargement is not proportional to the original figure.

JulsSmile [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

B. Corresponding parts must be in the same position.

You might be interested in

What will sue pay for 18 oranges if the cost 0.49 for 6 show the process

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

$\huge\boxed{\sf \$ \ 1.47}$

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3><u>Given that,</u></h3>

6 oranges = $0.49

Multiply 3 to both sides

6×3 oranges = $0.49 × 3

18 oranges = $1.47

$\rule[226]{225}{2}$

3 0

2 years ago

HelppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppPp

Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4) You just have to find the lcm of the denominators

a) lcm(4,3,6)=4*3=12

$\dfrac{3}{4} x-\dfrac{2}{3} =\dfrac{1}{6}x\\\\12*(\dfrac{3}{4} x-\dfrac{2}{3}) =12*(\dfrac{1}{6}x)\\\\12*\dfrac{3}{4} x-12*\dfrac{2}{3} =12*\dfrac{1}{6}x\\\\9*x-8 =2*x\\\\9*x-2*x =8\\\\7*x=8\\\\x=\dfrac{8}{7} \\$

b) I don't know the name of the property but it is :

"We can multiply the two members of an equality by the same non-zero number, we obtain an equality. "

$-6x+10+8x=12-4x\\\\(-6x+10)+8x=12-4x\\\\8x+(-6x+10)=12-4x\\\\8x-6x+10=12-4x\\\\2x+10=12-4x\\....$

7 0

3 years ago

Explain why 235 is not divisible by 7

otez555 [7]

Because 35 is divisible by 7, but 23-21=2, so it becomes 25, which 7 is not a factor of. therefore, it is not divisible by 7.

4 0

3 years ago

Helpppppppppppppp

Genrish500 [490]

Answer: Vertical angles are congruent.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given picture, NS and RT are intersecting line segments, intersects at point Q.

We know that when two lines intersect to make an cross, angles on opposite sides of the cross are called vertical angles. These angles are equal by the theorem that says Vertical angles are congruent.

⇒∠NQT ≅ ∠SQR

Therefore, the reason that justifies the step 2 :- ∠NQT ≅ ∠SQR is "Vertical angles are congruent" in the proof.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Solve for p. <br><br> 1. i = prt<br> 2. p = i-rt<br> 3. p = i/(rt)<br> 4. p = (rt)/i

Flauer [41]

The answer will be p = i/rt instead. You just flipped the process by mistake :)

6 0

3 years ago