1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
8

What do scientist think contributed to the development of language?

History
1 answer:
scoundrel [369]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Read vvv

Explanation:

As it’s impossible to track words and linguistic ability directly through the archaeological record, scientists have previously attempted to study the evolution of language through “proxy indicator” skills, such as early art or the ability to make more sophisticated tools. The authors of the new study, a team of scientists led by Thomas Morgan, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, took a different approach. Rather than consider toolmaking solely a proxy for language ability, the team explored how language might help modern humans learn to make tools using the same techniques their early ancestors did.

In the experiment, the scientists took 184 volunteers—students from the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom—and broke them into five groups; archaeologists then instructed the first person in the technique known as Oldowan stone-knapping. Oldowan tools, named for the famous Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, where archaeologists Louis and Mary Leakey discovered the implements in the 1930s, were widespread among early humans between 2.5 and 1.8 million years ago. The technique consisted of striking a stone “hammer” against a stone “core” to flake off pieces and create a sharp edge that could be used to cut, chop and scrape; the flakes themselves were also sharp enough to use for cutting plants and butchering animals.

Each of the five groups proceeded in different ways: In the first, a pair of volunteers were simply given the stone “core,” a hammer and some examples of flakes, then told to go about their business without guidance. In the second group, the second student learned how to make the tools by simply watching his fellow volunteer (who had been taught the technique) and trying to duplicate his actions without communication. In the third, the volunteers showed each other what they were doing but with no talking or gesturing. The fourth group was allowed to gesture and point, while in the fifth group, the “teacher” was allowed to say whatever he or she wanted to the other volunteers. In the next round of the experiment, the learner became the teacher, creating five different “chains” of transmission; in all, the volunteers produced more than 6,000 stone flakes.

According to the results of the study, published this week in the journal Nature Communications, the first group predictably had very little success when left to their own devices. What was striking, however, was that performance improved very little among those who simply watched their fellow volunteers make the tools. Only those who were allowed to gesture and talk while teaching performed significantly better than the baseline the scientists had established. By one measurement, gesturing doubled the likelihood that a student would produce a viable stone flake in a single strike, while verbal teaching quadrupled that likelihood.

Taking their results into consideration, researchers concluded that early humans might have developed the beginnings of spoken language–known as a proto-language–in order to successfully teach and pass along the ability to make the stone tools they needed for their survival. Such capacity to communicate would have been necessary, they suggest, for our ancestors to make the rapid leap from the Oldowan toolmaking process to more advanced stone tools, which occurred around 2 million years ago.

Dietrich Stout, an archaeologist at Emory University in Atlanta, praised the new study’s innovation, telling Science magazine that “a major strength of the paper is that it adopts an experimental approach to questions that have otherwise largely been addressed through intuition or common sense.” Still, Stout and other scientists urge caution before taking the study’s conclusions at face value without more direct proof. For one thing, the study’s conclusions don’t take into account that the modern volunteers have grown up with language, so it could be expected that they would learn more effectively with it than without; this may not have been true for early humans.

hoped it helped :D

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELPPP!!!!! ASAPPP ITS A QUIZ
likoan [24]

Answer:

Writing systems were developed to record food surplus and supply.

Explanation:

Ok so these big agrarian civilizations needed to organize, and they came up with writing so they could keep track of just about everything.

3 0
2 years ago
URGENT WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
lakkis [162]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What teaching style is identified with Socrates, and what was it like
gtnhenbr [62]

What teaching style is identified with Socrates, and what was it like? The teaching style was the question and answer style also known as the Socratic method. This teaching style was good for the young people because it taught them to think about things harder.

Hoped that helped:)

6 0
2 years ago
The excerpt below comes from a 1972 law that amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964: No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of
Mumz [18]

Answer:

It extended the protections of the Civil Rights Act to women.

Explanation:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a large step forward in the effort to abolished segregation in public places, bigotry, and marginalization triggered by racism, sexism, or religious intolerance. Title IX  of the education amendments of 1972 forbids educational institutions funded by the federal government from discrimination against students and other workers of the institution on the basis of their sex. It is regarded to be one of the magnificent legislative victories of the civil rights movement.

3 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIESTTTT ASAP!!!
djverab [1.8K]

of all of them or one?

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which function is shown in the graph below
    6·1 answer
  • According to the passage, why was the Magna Carta originally written?
    8·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from the preamble to the Constitution. . . . [A]nd secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posteri
    12·1 answer
  • What was the intended purpose of the equal rights amendment
    11·1 answer
  • How did the fact that Italian artists painted often painted frescoes on large church walls lead to the development of the techni
    7·2 answers
  • Who was the colonial ambassador to Britain at the time of the Boston tea party
    10·1 answer
  • Why did George Washington Bush end up as a pioneer in Washington Territory?
    6·1 answer
  • Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy differed from that of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft by its emphasis on
    10·1 answer
  • Based on the information in the table, what can be concluded about feudalism in Japan and Europe?
    14·2 answers
  • Are Vanessa & Kate allowed to peacefully protest against a law requiring all females to
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!