1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
7

CIVICS PLEASE I NEED HELP IF YOU DONT KNOW THE ANSWER AND YOU THINK YOU KNOW DONT ANSWER PLEASE )

Social Studies
1 answer:
Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. The colonist lived under a tyrannical rule of the British so they decided to use an opposite model of government.

Explanation:

Under the Old British's system of government all the decisions in the country is centralized to a very small group of people (The King and his trusted advisers).  This system make it really difficult for the people to resist the government when the decisions negatively impact the livelihood of the people.

Under the Articles of the Confederation, the Framers proposed that the new model of government should give the states with the power to regulate themselves without direct intervention from the Central government. By doing this, they hope that the central government wouldn't turned into a tyranny.

You might be interested in
People who stop taking relatively high doses of benzodiazepines can experience an abrupt return of the original anxiety they wer
telo118 [61]
This is called "Discontinuation Syndrome." It is one side effect of taking antidepressants that will happen after stopping taking the drug. It is widely recognized and studied in psychology.
8 0
3 years ago
What would happen if citizens did not meet their duties and responsibilities? How would U.S. society
telo118 [61]

Answer:

<h2>Citizens in the US have only one duty, to follow the laws of the federal, state, and local governments. We have the opportunity to vote, make public comment on any subject, to gather together, etc. That is established in the Constitution of the United States. </h2><h2 /><h3>As to what happens if we don't do these things? If you break the law, you are tried and, if convicted, punished. If you don't vote or do any of the other freedoms granted by the Constitution, there is no legal consequence.</h3>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a plaintiff feels that individual acts of intentional discrimination in his firm have led to a statistical disparity in the f
dlinn [17]

Answer: pattern or practice lawsuit

Explanation:

Pattern or practice case

This is a case whereby the plaintiff tries to show in court that they have been subjected into discriminatory situations which were committed by the defendant.

The plaintiff shows that the policies and procedures were actual used in committing such a discriminatory act towards them.

This case comprises discrimination of the following nature :

Housing discrimination

School segregation

Employment discrimination

A plaintiff will be required to provide evidence or any proof that shows that the defendant behaviour is actual an ongoing practice.

5 0
3 years ago
john lives in a country where he can be arrested for saying something that hurts another person's feelings. John most likely liv
sertanlavr [38]
If your asking where he lives he could live In North Korea
7 0
3 years ago
Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003?
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.

Explanation:

The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.

The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Urbanization: A. is growing more quickly in developing countries than in developed countries. B. currently accounts for housing
    12·1 answer
  • How did the views of w.<br> e.<br> b. du bois change as he grew older?
    6·2 answers
  • Your friend hopes to expand her business to multiple locations. It would be best for her to create a
    13·2 answers
  • How does the geography of Australia impact the economy?
    11·1 answer
  • What kind of dwelling did people live in
    5·1 answer
  • Stuart is 15 and likes "brain teaser" puzzles and word problems. He thinks about all possible alternatives and tries to eliminat
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following are characteristics of hard money
    5·2 answers
  • What was the leading city state in Greece in 450 BC and what made it strong
    6·1 answer
  • How does the 10th amendment shown below demonstrate a constitutional provision for limiting government?
    14·1 answer
  • To what extent was Western Europe involved in Globalization? pls help make a reflection
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!