1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
3 years ago
5

Ronald Reagan's economic policy of "trickle down economics" assumed that if big business were given tax breaks, money would be s

aved by the business and shared with workers and consumers.
True or False
History
2 answers:
lyudmila [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

During the 1980s, US President Ronald Reagan was subjected to certain extreme liberal and supply-side economic policies. During this period, taxes were reduced and production was supported, and economic growth and development were thought to accelerate.

According to planned economic policy during this period, when taxes are reduced, the rich invest more and the banks lend more. Through this, more jobs will be held and economic growth will increase.

It was believed that in countries where such policies were implemented, wealth would spread from top to bottom. This policy was implemented in the Ronald Reagan era in a narrow sense and was known as a "trickle down economics".

Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
3 0

Trickling the economy is a theory that deals with the benefits of wealth and how they have reduced in individuals. These benefits, therefore, include cutting down taxes higher income generation and other gains and dividends.

The theory assumes that the investors and other savers are the significant drivers of the growth of the economy. This states that they are likely to use .more stocks, and lending in the banking will increase. Owners will invest more and hire more workers.

You might be interested in
How did 9/11 affect most Americans personally?
kvasek [131]
  1. The threat of terrorism has grown significantly. Although there were terrorist strikes before to 9/11 (e.g., the bombing of embassies and the bombing of Oklahoma City), none were as serious or well-planned.
  2. increased security at airports and on aircraft. The entire globe wished to avoid another 9/11.
  3. War in Afghanistan: After 9/11, America developed a mistrust of the Taliban-led Afghanistan and the fact that it was harboring several terrorist organizations.
  4. War in Iraq: Following 9/11, there were concerns that Saddam Hussein was harboring terrorist organizations that aimed to harm the US and the West as well as being suspected of possessing WMDs. All of this culminated in the Iraq War in 2003, the effects of which are still being felt today (ISIS)
  5. distrust of the Muslim community. Americans had a great deal of mistrust towards Muslims in general after 9/11 because they thought some of them would be terrorists. This mistrust is still present in the alt-right movement today.
  6. Patriot Act: broad citizen surveillance to combat terrorism (lone wolf or part of a group). This conduct sparked a heated discussion about the trade-off between freedom and security, which continues today.
  7. The American endeavor to police the world did not end in Iraq and Afghanistan. Additionally, there were military operations in Somalia, airstrikes in Libya, and support for Syrian rebels.
6 0
2 years ago
Prime Minister of Japan in 1941 to 1944?
Ad libitum [116K]
 that would have been Hideki Tojo
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true about British imperialism in India during the
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

I could litteraly say anything and it wouldn't be true.

Explanation:

Please give me some options to pick from or something.

6 0
3 years ago
The most effective tactic the colonists used against the hated taxes was a buying of British goods.
aivan3 [116]

<em>Hi There!!</em>

<em>I think the answer is </em><em>False</em><em>.</em>

<em>Because, I think there was that it was an indirect tax that was hard to protest. related to molasses, which was an everyday item. only required traders to pay the new tax. was an example of taxation without representation.</em>

<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this is wrong...</em>

GoodLuck!!

<em>#</em>Be<em> </em>Bold

<em># </em>Always<em> </em>Brainly!!

_{Loserbrazts}

ヾ(•ω•`)o

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Adam Smith, what happens when the supply of a product decreases?
BARSIC [14]

<span>The mechanism establishing natural price by Adam Smith connects with effective demand and free competition. If you cut the supply of goods, the demand for them is higher. Because of this, there competition between buyers. Afraid not get the right product, they agree to buy it at a higher cost. The market price will rise. When supply and demand are roughly equal, the market value corresponds to approximately natural.</span>

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the name for a painting created by applying pigments to damp plaster walls? fresco mosaic caliph mosque
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement explains why the Middle region was known as the "breadbasket"?The borders of the Middle region were shaped like
    7·2 answers
  • The physical location of a place is called a__________. site situation scenario scale
    11·2 answers
  • What pull factors brought people to the west? Explain
    9·1 answer
  • Which person’s teachings form the basis for Christianity?
    9·2 answers
  • What would be a solution for Iraq to solve the water shortage they face?
    15·1 answer
  • The British had not been forced to repair damages resulting from an enemy invasion.<br> It’s d :)
    13·1 answer
  • At an oceanic-oceanic convergent boundary, ____.
    5·2 answers
  • What was the reaction following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr.?
    11·1 answer
  • A piece of legislation that called for popular sovereignty to decide the slavery issue was the fugitive slave act. the missouri
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!