During which historical event did japan gain control over Korea?

2 answers:

8 0

The answer is "C) The Russo-Japanese War"

If this is indeed correct go ahead and mark brainliest so that others know its correct.

The rest of the answers are
1) D
2) A
3) C
4) B
5) C
6) A
7) C
8) B
9) A
10) B

spin [16.1K]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is C) The Russo-Japanese War.

The historical event where Japan gained control over Korea was the Russo-Japanese War.

With the victory of Japan over Russia in the Russian-Japanese War (1904-1905), Russian dropped its idea of expansion through the East of the continent. Russia wanted to control Korea and Manchuria. Japan impeeded that, and the victory represented the first time in modern history when an Asian army defeated a European army. That is why is correct to say that the historical event where Japan gained control over Korea was the Russo-Japanese War.

You might be interested in

The Juanillo Rebellion of 1597 and the Yamasee War of 1715 were similar in that A) they were conflicts between the Native Americ

Anna11 [10]

C.)each was an example of Indian resistance to the presence of European colonies.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which type of speech is most likely to employ idealism? A. a speech to a military battalion on its way into battle B. an address

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

c. an adress to the public announcing plans for a millitary intervention

Explanation:

you need to convince your public that nothing is going to go wrong, and how you are their savior, to do that, you need to employ idealism, to show them that everything is okay

6 0

3 years ago

Air currents ocean currents and climate escape room level 3

elixir [45]

Answer:

pomonta ka sa bay bay at maligo ka hahhaha thanks me later

6 0

3 years ago

Is san francisco san diego a megapolis

elixir [45]

They are both, I believe, considered megapolis's

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How do changing prices affect supply and demand?

-Dominant- [34]

Typically changing prices only affect supply and demand when one creates artificial demand for it. In almost any cases, it is typically the supply and demand that affects the price changes.

We must firstly understand how supply and demand affect changing prices before we can understand the opposite effect. For example, if there is 100 units, and there are only 50 buyers, the supply is more than the demand. To generate artificial demand therefore, the supplier may lower the prices in an effort to sell off all units. On the other hand, if there is 100 units, but there are more than 100 buyers, than the supplier may raise the prices. This lowers the demand for the product as well as maximizing profits. This example assumes that there is only one supplier of the unit that is in demand.

If however, the supplier has competitors within the field (and is not bound by law to set a certain rate), they may change the prices to be lower than their competitors, in an effort to increase more demand for the prices. It would artificially drive down prices, thereby making profits less. If competitors are not able to survive with less profit and/or be able to lower their own prices, they would be forced to go out of business, either by closing or selling their shops. In turn, when the original company buys up their competitors assets, they then hold a monopoly or close to a monopoly of the given field. This allows them to artificially change the price on their own discretion, typically known for the term price-gouging. Historically in the United States, this has occurred, especially in the oil industry, but price-gouging of many consumer necessities have been banned and a official rate has been set for them.

Essentially, in a true supply and demand, changing a price to be higher than market value may lead to a lower demand, and therefore a surplus of the product, which leads to a artificial low price, while changing a price to be below market value may generate higher demand, which in turn leads to a artificial high price.

5 0

2 years ago