It would be a. "We the people of the United States ... do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
We can rule out c immediately, because it has dependent clauses standing on its own. B. can also be ruled out, because the clause in-between the hyphen does not read correctly. A. is correct grammatically, but D. is also grammatically correct and it explains it in a quick and understandable way.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer:
According to blank slate theory, the mind is completely blank at birth. From there, education, environment, and experiences – which are external, as well as material and/or immaterial – shape the child's process of development. This leaves a lasting effect on who they become.
Answer:
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Explanation:
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Why are you talking help in french wow u bad
Answer:
Mature writing uses broader vocabulary, while immature writing is very descriptive, and often longer.
Explanation:
Mature writing example:
It was obvious that the boy was struggling emotionally.
Immature writing example:
The boy looked very sad, he was crying, and he didn't talk much.
They both get the same point across, but the 1st one sounds way better than the 2nd.
