My answer would be 8.. I may not be correct, but I tried. So, I placed the numbers from least to greatest and split it 1’s and 2’s VS 3’s and 4’s. I just added 1 plus 2 plus 2 and a half plus 2 and a half and got 8. I also added (3+3+3)+3 and a half plus 3
The answer is no 2 million add to 300 million or three variables from close
Answer:
provides information about the strength of a relationship
Step-by-step explanation:
A numerical measure of strength in the linear relationship between any two variables is called the Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient.
The co efficient of correlation is a pure number denoted by r , independent of the units in which the variables are measured that can range from+1 to -1 .
The sign of r indicates the direction of the cor relation.
When r= 0 it does not mean that there is no relationship . For example if the observed values lie exactly on a circle , there is a relationship between variables but r = 0 as r only measure linear cor relation.
The 2nd statement given is the correct answer.
It is not related to ordinal or nominal properties and it does show direction.
Answer:
1/480
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>for the 6 sided one</h3>
rolling a 5 is 1/6
<h3>for the 8 sided one</h3>
rolling a 5 is 1/8
<h3>for the 10 sided one</h3>
rolling a 5 is 1/10
total probability= 1/6*1/8*1/10
= 1/480
Answer:
(a) A = 700×1.015^t
(b) 36.2 years
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Each year, the account value is multiplied by (1 + 1.5%) = 1.015. Repeated multiplication is signified using an exponent. In t years, when the account has been multiplied by 1.015 t times, the account value will be ...
A = $700×1.015^t
__
(b) You want to find t when A=$1200. Logarithms are involved.
1200 = 700×1.015^t . . . . use 1200 for A
1200/700 = 1.015^t . . . . . divide by 700
log(12/7) = t×log(1.015) . . . . . take logarithms
log(12/7)/log(1.015) = t ≈ 36.2 . . . . divide by the coefficient of t
It will take about 36.2 years for the account balance to reach $1200.
