Answer:
Rights are natural and are endowed by the very nature of our existence. It then follows that we cannot be separated from them, they are inalienable. Rights can be abused, restricted in their use or made ineffective but they cannot be removed. A person can be punished for saying something unpopular but short of killing him that person can still say whatever he wants. Since a right is inalienable, it cannot be separated from a person that person cannot transfer it either. What would be the point after all since everyone is equally endowed with the same natural rights.
If that is understood then everything else conferred on us by society then should be recognized as privilege. The first right that applies to your question is the right to equitable treatment. Even the poorest has equal claim on services that are available. The second right in play here is the right to aquire property and to be secure in its ownership. When any outside force whether it is your neighbor or the government attempts to tresspass on your ownership of the property it is theft and a violation of the owner's rights.
To claim the poorest person has a right to services, equitable treatment sustains that right. But to claim that a person who cannot pay for that service but is entitled to it at another's expense is theft.
<h3>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u></h3>
The answer is C, We. I hope this helped, let me know if you need further explanation.
Answer:
The answer is the second option, B.
23 year -old- man who lives in florida with his wife jane and just got married and had no children, they are taking a honey moon to florida. once they arrived at florida they decided they needed to go back to florida and fly to Pakistan. instead its was there 25 year old daughters birthday and scene it was the color purple it was to late to go to the park in the afternoon so they arrived shortly to class and went to Jurassic park at the schools pumpkin patch.
