Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
In this question, we compare the net income and the difference should be reported
In the first case, the net income is
= Revenue - expense
= $1,000,000 - $750,000
= $250,000
In the first case, the net income is
= Revenue - expense
where,
Revenue is = $1,000,000 + $150,000 = $1,150,000
And, the expenses is $750,000 + $60,000 = $810,000
= $1,150,000 - $810,000
= $340,000
So, the net profit is increased by
= $340,000 - $250,000
= $90,000
Answer:
Liquor consumers
Explanation:
Price elasticity measures the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price. Demand is elastic if a small change in price has a great effect on quantity demanded. The coefficient of elasticity is usually greater than 1.
Demand is inelastic if changes in price has little or no impact on the quantity demanded. Coefficient of elasticity is usually less than 1.
The elasticity of demand for liquor is -0.4 while the elasticity of supply for liquor is 3.5. Therefore the demand for liquor is inelastic while the supply of liquor is elastic.
If taxes are imposed on consumers, the quantity demanded wouldn't change or change a little.
If taxes are imposed on suppliers, the quantity supplied would fall more.
Therefore , the burden of tax can be passed on more to consumers.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
The solution as per the given problem is provided below throughout the explanation portion below.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Debt issued,
= 120
Pretax earnings,
= 80
Tax,
= 35%
All equity firm,
= $320
Number of common stock,
= 50
(a)
Balance sheet before the debt issue's announcement will be:
<u>Assets </u><u> 320</u>
<u>Debt </u><u> 0</u>
<u>Equity </u><u> 320</u>
then,
The total will be "320".
(b)
The per share price will be:
= 
= 
= 
or,
After tax, the net income will be:
= 
= 
= 
= 
(c)
The return on equity will be:
= 
= 
= 
or,
= 
(%)
Answer:
Examples include torture, starvation, deprivation of religion, abortion, etc.
Explanation:
I don't know if that's what you need. I can give more examples.
