Answer:
-1 to +1
Explanation:
The correlation coefficient range is from -1 to +1.
-1 shows that there is perfect negative correlation.
+1 shows that there is perfect positive correlation.
0 shows there is no correlation.
Positive correlation shows that with the increase of let's say X, there would also be increase of Y. They would positively move together
Negative correlation shows that two variable move in opposite direction.
Answer:
prices to fall according to the classical economists and unemployment to increase according to Keynes.
Explanation:
The classical economists believes that a decrease in aggregate demand for goods produced would being about fall in the prices of such goods. What this implies is that as more goods are produced, if such production is not backed by corresponding demand by consumers, the prices of such goods produced will eventually fall because supply is greater than demand.
For the Keynes, their argument is that a decrease in aggregate demand will cause unemployment to increase. This is because owners of businesses or employers would lay off their employees when goods produced exceeds the demand for such production by consumers. Here, owners of businesses pays their employees through sales of goods produced. So, when the goods produced are not purchased, then there will be excess availability of such goods; hence no sale or profit, from which salaries would be paid. The next step is to start laying off employees because employers cannot cover their running costs.
Answer:
The company should accept Project B because it generates more value per year as compared to Project A.
Explanation:
Explanation can be seen in the file attached.
Answer:
decreases
Explanation:
When bonds are sold at a premium, it is sold at a price higher than the par value. For example, if the par value is $100, the bond would be selling at a premium if it is sold at $101. At expiration of the bond's tenor, the price of the bond must equal its par value, so at each each interest payment day, the interest expense decreases
Answer:
C) III
- III. No, the policy was excluded from Joseph's estate.
Explanation:
It doesn't matter who pays the policy's premiums, what matters is who is the beneficiary of the policy. If the proceeds of the policy are paid to the insured's estate, then they are part of it, but if the proceeds are paid to another beneficiary, then they are not included in the estate.
Since Joseph's wife was the owner and beneficiary of the policy, the proceeds will be paid directly to her. The advantage here is that proceeds from the life insurance policy are not taxed as income, but if Joseph's state was larger than $5.43 million, then estate taxes might apply.
