A firm that produces units of output using capital and labor to determine its total costs will decline by doing so, the firm will evaluate its:<u> Marginal cost Function .</u>
<u></u>
Option C is correct .
Marginal cost is the change in cost due to producing on excess unit of affair. To determine how big its total cost decline, the establishment will estimate its marginal cost function.
<h3>
Marginal cost function :</h3>
Marginal cost represents the gradual costs incurred when producing fresh units of a good or service. It's figured by taking the total change in the cost of producing further goods and dividing that by the change in the number of goods produced.Marginal cost is calculated as the aggregate charges needed to manufacture one fresh good. thus, it can be measured by changes to what charges are incurred for any given fresh unit.<u> Marginal Cost</u><u> = Change in</u><u> Total Charges ÷</u><u> Change in volume of Units Produced.</u>
Question is incomplete ,missing option is given below :
Consider a firm that produces units of output using capital and labor. Due to changes in market conditions, it has decided to reduce its daily output from 5 units to 4 units. To determine how much its total costs will decline by doing so, the firm will evaluate its: Group of answer choices
A.marginal product function
B.average product function
C.marginal cost function
D.average total cost function
E.average variable cost function
Learn more about Marginal cost function :
brainly.com/question/17481520
#SPJ4
History raise a person wage on average by about 8.50
The major factor that contributes to the decline of occupations in industries such as textile and clothing is due to the change of technology. Through the technological advancement, innovators are able to machines that work twice as fast as human beings.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
Answer:
this is a cost minimization problem, but it is missing some numbers, so I looked for similar questions (see attached PDF):
minimization equation = 20x₁ + 22x₂ + 18x₃ (costs per ton)
where:
x₁ = mine I
x₂ = mine II
x₃ = mine III
the constraints are:
4x₁ + 6x₂ + x₃ ≥ 54 (high grade ore)
4x₁ + 4x₂ + 6x₃ ≥ 65 (low grade ore)
x₁, x₂, x₃ ≤ 7 (only 7 days per week)
using solver, the optimal solution is
2x₁, 7x₂, and 5x₃
a. The number of days Mine I should operate = <u>2 days
</u>
b. The number of days Mine Il should operate = <u>7 days
</u>
c. The number of days Mine III should operate = <u>5 days
</u>
d. The total cost of the operation for next week = <u>$284,000</u>