1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirza4 [7]
3 years ago
15

Which is an accurate description of the way the conquistadors treated Native Americans?

History
1 answer:
Vlada [557]3 years ago
5 0
 many of the natives died from imported diseases, which interior the instantaneous sense weren't the Spaniards' fault (that they had no concept-about disease concept then and may't be held in charge for his or her lack of understanding). yet, wide-spread, the answer is, "Badly." The conquistadors were after gold and treasure. even as they were given right here in the time of that some Indians had some and knew the position to get more advantageous, they did now no longer hesitate to enslave them and lead them to paintings for his or her new masters.
You might be interested in
How did Manifest Destiny encourage westward expansion?
zavuch27 [327]

Manifest Destiny was a term that described the widespread belief in the mid-19th century that the United States had a special mission to extend west.

Explanation:

  • The concept was not particularly new, as Americans were already exploring and settling west, first across the Appalachian Mountains in the late 1700s and then, beyond the Mississippi River in the early 1790s.
  • But by presenting the concept of Western expansion as one's religious mission, the idea of manifest destiny struck a chord.
  • Although the phrase manifest destiny seems to have taken on a public mood in the mid-19th century, it has not been observed with universal approval.
  • Some at the time thought that they were simply putting pseudo-religious fields on a radiant craving and conquest.

Learn more on Manifest Destiny on

brainly.com/question/873877

brainly.com/question/7668829

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIESTTT ASAPP!!!
Anni [7]

I'm just quoting from a website

"the factors leading to the downfall of empires of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai

Climate change and struggles with Berber groups in the Sahara led to the downfall of the Ghanaian Kingdom

Later kings followed the patrilineal tradition, where the eldest son succeeds the father. Since there seems to have been no strict tradition, there were many fights over succession. This led to civil wars and was a large part of the reason why the Mali Empire declined.

Like the Mali Empire, the Songhai Empire also suffered from many battles over succession. In Songhai, the brothers of the king often tried to depose him; in turn, some kings tried to protect themselves by killing all their brothers. The last great battle for succession occurred when a great army general challenged a new king. Many men were killed in the battle for control of the country and the Songhai army was weakened. When troops from Morocco invaded to seize control of and revive the trans-Saharan trade in gold, the Songhai Empire could not win and was conquered, making this the last of the great West African empires."

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late 1900s, how did agriculture change in the South?
slamgirl [31]

Answer:

The most accurate answer I think is C

Explanation:

Because in late 1900s South was modernized and the development of trucks, automobiles, planes made easy to carry crops

And the the agriculture was very easy and more efficient

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a major cause of social unrest in Russia in 1900?
Dvinal [7]
I believe it’s c but i’m not sure if it’s correct
8 0
3 years ago
What was the affect of the Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland?
stiks02 [169]
The McCulloch v. Maryland is the case that went to the Supreme Court because the state of Maryland wanted to tax the National Bank established by the Congress. The court ruled that under the Article I, Section 8, the "Necessary and Proper" clause that the state could not tax the institution of the the federal government. This is an landmark case and its effect was that this supported the federal government over the state governments. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Lines 239–254: Cite evidence to explain the opposing view and counterargument that King presents in these lines.
    5·1 answer
  • An effect of Gamal Abdel Nasser's rule in Egypt was spreading of
    10·2 answers
  • How are the members of different branches of government selected?
    7·1 answer
  • What gods didn't help Odysseus
    5·1 answer
  • How did the government want services to help in the war effort
    14·1 answer
  • Adam Smith believed the government’s role in laissez-faire capitalism was
    8·1 answer
  • Were slaves essentially manufactured
    15·1 answer
  • Which phrase from the Preamble to the Constitution gives the best reason for states to work together cooperatively?
    11·1 answer
  • Hi This is for samhil24 we love brainly
    15·1 answer
  • What is the correct definition of an artifcat
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!