Answer: <em>Option (A) is correct.</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's assume the following result from the data analyzed:
Most motorcyclists who were involved in serious accidents, they did not take in consideration to take the course - this would suggest "Motorcyclists who did not take the course were more likely to get in a serious accident."
Therefore, if only 8% of motorcyclists have taken in consideration to take up this course, then this would predict that courses did not have a compelling effect on safety, thereby hindering the argument.
However, if compelling more than 8% of motorcyclists took this course, then the data would predict that courses were effective.
It should be 130 as from day one to day two and to day three it goes up by 10 so 12*10+10
The answer is D, none of these.
This is because whole numbers, rational numbers, and integers fit within the category of rational numbers, which is the complete opposite of irrational numbers.
A. it is not in scientific notation because the number in the ones place has to be greater than 0 but less than 9. So 11 is more than 9 so A is not in scientific notation.