Answer:
To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.
Answer:
False identity refers to the concept of a person pretending to be what he or she is not.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. are likely to pursue their own self-interest, even if their self-interest conflicts with the public interest.
Explanation:
The public choice theory analyzes political behavior through applying theories and methods of economics. It assumes that people in the process of political are motivated by their own self-interests and that their spur is the market (housing, car market etc).
Answer:
Study of new international labour market is the main purpose of the board of foreign employment promotion.
Answer:
theory that having a strong president of the United States would become a monarchy of sorts. ... Taxes were a concern as well, as Anti-Federalists were worried that Congress had enough power to both pass, and enforce, taxes that would be oppressive.
Explanation:https://legaldictionary.net/anti-federalist/