Answer:
Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.
Explanation:
In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the<u> levels-of-processing effect</u> that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.
There are two main levels of processing: <u>shallow processing</u>, which has to do with fragile memory, and <u>deep processing</u><u>,</u> that involves a more durable memory trace.
<u>Deep processing</u> can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, <u>deep processing</u> can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.
This is known as observational learning.
Yes, this statement is true.
What is the purpose of the point count system?
When a driver may be prosecuted for being a Negligent Operator of a Motor Vehicle, the point count system is intended to warn them. If you are in an accident and cannot demonstrate that you are financially responsible, your license will be suspended (insurance).
What is the importance of learning the meaning of traffic signs?
Drivers and other road users can learn useful information from traffic signs. They serve as reminders of the laws that are intended to keep you safe and assist in conveying to drivers and pedestrians messages that can help keep the peace and lower the number of accidents. It can be risky to ignore them.
Learn more about traffic signs: brainly.com/question/11855814
#SPJ4
Answer:
Independent Premises
Explanation:
Independent Premises simply means that when an argument has two or more arguments fused into one, such that if the argument is split into different or separate arguments, they will still support or equate to the same conclusion. Hence, the premises of this separate arguments are independently or termed independent premises.
In the statement or argument of the question, it can be separated as:
1. ...He will not raise taxes.
2. ...He will crack down on gang violence.
The word "and" in the argument, makes it a conjunction of two independent premises.
