1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
10

Do dinosaurs still might live today?

History
1 answer:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
5 0
That is a possibility. Some dinosaurs could have evolved into other things such as crocodiles and alligators. We don't truly know if that is true, but it might be.
You might be interested in
Which best explains how ancient greek culture influenced emporor justian I
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:The study of ancient Greek language and education helped Justinian create a "New Rome

7 0
2 years ago
Can the Renaissance be
Svetllana [295]

Yes, Renaissance is considered a Period of Progress

French for "rebirth," the term "renaissance" is used to describe a time in European history that lasted from A.D. 1400 to A.D. 1600. But according to several historians, depending on the nation, it began earlier or finished later. It connected the Middle Ages to modern history and, depending on the nation, it also overlapped with the Early Modern, Elizabethan, and Restoration eras. Italy, where the Renaissance first emerged in the 14th century, is the country most often associated with it, though France, England, and Germany also experienced many of the same cultural developments and phenomena.

The word "renaissance" is derived from the French for "rebirth." According to the City University of New York at Brooklyn, the Middle Ages, during which classical philosophy was largely disregarded or forgotten, saw a "rebirth" of intense interest in and learning about classical antiquity.

Learn more about Renaissance here: brainly.com/question/879750

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
How is the peace movement participating in the political process?!! ASPPP 61 POINTSSS!!!
telo118 [61]

Answer:

In the fall of 2010, 88-year-old Horst-Eberhard Richter was invited to present his newly published book, Moral in Zeiten der Krise  in Berlin. The chairperson introduced him as the one who had given the peace movement its intellectual and analytical basis, and went on to say that Richter was credited with intellectually binding together psychoanalysis, perspectives on peace, and political protest. The author almost brusquely responded that this was not what it was all about. It was about a common future, social involvement, and a new sense that science carried a political responsibility. The peace movement was a social movement comprised of diverse individuals devoted to a common cause with a common collective identity and typically organized on democratic grassroots principles, with self-organization, through a Coordinating Committee. As such, it took a skeptical view of political leaders. However, notwithstanding its grassroots-inspired structures of decision-making, there were key players who succeeded in developing particularly high public profi les with regard to certain issues. For the purpose of introducing such “protagonists” of the peace movement and their celebrity status, the movement is divided here into the following social and political groups: Christians, politically independent participants.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Which document said that all settlers in Jamestown had the same rights as the people in England?
stepan [7]
THE MARCHES OF THE WORLD BEYOND 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A system of government that attempts to destroy all distinctions between individuals and force equal distribution of property is
earnstyle [38]

Communist government

Communist governments attempt to create equality in the society by taking ownership of industry and land. The land is then redistributed equally among the workers of the land to create equality. Government regulated industry allows the government to regulate hours and wages for the workers in theory making sure all of the profits are returned to the workers.

The USSR and China both used this method in moving their countries from their previous government to a communist system. The focus for the USSR was regulation and ownership of industry whereas China focused on collecting farm land and redistributing to all the people. Both methods were used in each country, but each focused on different industries because their revolutions came from different bases. The USSR had a revolution led by workers and in China it was led by peasants.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A reporter covering Congress will probably try hardest to get an interview with __________.
    10·2 answers
  • How does globalization affect your life?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain how the village of catal huyuk was constructed
    11·1 answer
  • What kinds of items were found at a public square in Temixtitlan? A. precious metals and animal skins B. both necessities and je
    14·1 answer
  • In American elections require a majority? Plurality? Explain
    6·1 answer
  • What right did roman women have?
    13·2 answers
  • What kinds of aggressive steps did Hitler take in the 1930s? How did European leaders respond? Why?
    10·1 answer
  • What gives Congress the power to raise taxes to fund services
    12·1 answer
  • Why would the cabinet meeting be taking place in new york city
    12·1 answer
  • How long did slaves need to serve in the Continental Army to be granted their freedom?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!